Saturday, March 1, 2014

‘Impotent’ Rage of
Salman Khurshid
against Narendra Modi


Part - 2


by Ghatotkacha Nair

In the earlier part of this article, I had written about how Salman Khurshid, a Union Minister in the Congress-led UPA Government became livid with rage and accused Narendra Modi, Chief Minister of Gujarat of being a “Napumsak” for not having suppressed with Islamic fervour the Kaffir Hindu retaliation to a murderous Muslim assault on 58 unarmed Hindu passengers of Sabarmati Express at Godhra Station in 2002. Slave-minded Dhimmis like Mulayam Singh Yadav, Lalu Prasad Yadav, Nitish Kumar, Digvijay Singh and Karunanidhi would have done just that.

Narendra Modi, to the contrary, did not ruthlessly gun down Hindus like Mulayam Singh did in Uttar Pradesh in 1990 and this aroused implacable hatred for Narendra Modi in the “Moderate” Islamist Salman Khurshid. Narendra Modi followed the standard administrative procedures to maintain Law and Order in the State.

During the 1984 Congress-directed Genocide against the Sikh, the Islamists, pseudo-liberal pink-chaddi fashonistas, Marxists and Missionaries, all kept quiet. None demanded that Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi resign and face trial. None of these worthies bothered to compare him with Hitler or call him “Mauth Ka Saudagar”. Salman Khurshid did not tell Rajiv Gandhi “Hamara aarop hai ki tum napunsak ho.”

After all, no Muslims were killed in 1984. So why should it shock the conscience of any Congress Islamist. It becomes a heinous killing worth condemnation only when the Kaffirs rally around and successfully fight and subdue their Islamic oppressors.

At 7:43 A.M. on February 27th 2002, the Sabarmati Express rolled into the Godhra Railway Station, fortunately with a four-hour delay, in broad daylight. This train transported more than 2,000 people, mainly kar sewaks on their way back to Ahmedabad after participating in the Poorna Ahuti Yagya at Ayodhya, a ritual at the traditional birthplace of Rama.

As the Sabarmati Express pulled out of Godhra station, the train was pelted with stones and bricks, and passengers from several bogeys were forced to bring down their windows to protect themselves. Someone pulled the emergency chain: the train came to a halt about 100 metres away from the platform, surrounded by a large crowd of Muslims of over 1,000, pelting it with bricks, stones, then burning missiles and acid bulbs, especially on the S-5, S-6 and S-7 coaches. The doors were locked from outside. Coach S-6 caught fire and it was in flamesminutes later. Passengers who managed to get out of the burning compartment were attacked with sharp weapons, and stoned.

Fifty Eight unarmed Hindu pilgrims were burned alive, including Twenty Seven women and Ten children.

Numb with shock, the people of Gujarat did not react straightaway. They remained calm till that afternoon, when the charred bodies started arriving at their respective homes.

There was no condemnation for the planned Godhra murder of 58 Hindus from the Secularism-wallahs like Salman Khurshid and his overlord, the Italian-waitress-turned-Dictator-of-India, Sonia Gandhi.

Hurt deeply by this heartless indifference, and deafening silence — the Gujarati people known for their non-violent nature and exceptional patience became fired up with righteous wrath.

The day following the burning alive of unarmed Hindu pilgrims, Gujarati Hindu Retaliation broke out. The involvement of the tribal communities or Vanvasis, in the post-Godhra riots added a new dimension to the communal violence, as Justice Tewatia’s Report reveals: “In rural areas the Vanvasis attacked the Muslim moneylenders, shopkeepers and the forest contractors. They used their traditional bows and arrows as also their implements used to cut trees and grass while attacking Muslims. Apparently, the accumulated anger of years of exploitation … had become explosive.”

By evening, Chief Minister Narendra Modi announced his decision to deploy the Army, and the next day, March 1st, by 11 A.M. the actual deployment of troops at sensitive points had begun. Violence abated in most major cities, after their arrival with orders to shoot on sight. But security forces were largely outnumbered by the angry flood of people to rural areas and villages. Apprehending the seriousness of the situation, Chief Minister Narendra Modi had made a request for security personnel from neighbouring States of Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan and Punjab. All of them were ruled by Salman Khurshid’s Sonia Congress Party. This request was turned down by each State.

State          Chief Minister        From-To                               Political Party  
Maharashtra Vilasrao Deshmukh 18-01-1999 to 16-01-2003     Congress
MP               Digvijaya Singh      01-12-1998 to 08-12-2003     Congress
Rajasthan    Ashok Gehlot          01-12-1998 to 08-12-2003     Congress
Punjab         Amarinder Singh     26-02-2002 to 01-03-2007     Congress

Salman Khurshid has not told those Congress Chief Ministers Vilasrao Deshmukh, Digvijaya Singh, Ashok Gehlot and Amarinder Singh: “Hamara aarop hai ki tum napunsak ho.”

One high-level commission conducted by Justice Nanavati-Shah was appointed by the Gujarat Government to probe the incident. The first part of Justice Nanavati-Shah Inquiry Commission Report was released in September 2008, after four years of thorough investigations. It lifted the cloak of blame that had been wrapped around the Gujarati people all those years. It also cleared the name of Chief Minister of Gujarat, Narendra Modi.

“There is absolutely no evidence to show that either the Chief Minister and/or any other Minister(s) in his Council of Ministers or Police officers had played any role in the Godhra incident or that there was any lapse on their part in the matter of providing protection, relief and rehabilitation to the victims of communal riots or in the matter of not complying with the recommendations and directions given by National Human Rights Commission. ... Some individuals who had participated in the conspiracy appear to be involved in the heinous act of setting coach S/6 on fire ... The conspiracy hatched by these persons further appears to be a part of a larger conspiracy to create terror and destabilise the Administration.”

The recent report of Supreme Court appointed Special Investigation Team led by former CBI Chief R.K Raghavan gave clean chit to Gujarat government and noticed that the out-numbered and overwhelmed Gujarat Police tried everything to prevent the riots.

On Narendra Modi's role the Special Investigation Team Report states: “Law and order review meetings were held by Modi and all the things was done to control the situation... the Army was called on time to contain the communal violence. Modi was busy with steps to control the situation, establishment of relief camps for riot victims and also with efforts to restore peace and normalcy. In view of the detailed inquiry and satisfactory explanation of the person involved, no criminal case is made out against Narendra Modi.”

Narendra Modi is guilty by default because he is seen as a strong Hindu leader, just as Muslims are innocent by definition. Ergo, Narendra Modi has to be pilloried!

Moving on to 2013.
In the recent Muzzafarnagar riots under the benign rule of Congress ally Samajwadi Party Muslims and Jats clashed after eve-teasing of a Jat girl by Muslim rowdies. Muslim mobs attacked jats with fire arms and threw dead bodies of Jats into the Joly Canal. Although six bodies have been recovered, hundreds are still missing. There were several instances of gang-rapes. Approximately 50,000 people have been displaced. Several children died in relief camps in the winter cold. Sonia Congress Party’s ally Samajwadi Party, controlled by fellow Jihadi Azam Khan is ruling Uttar Pradesh. Why isn’t Salman Khurshid calling Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Akhilesh Yadav a “Napumsak”?

Times of India reported on Mar 6, 2013 that Rahul Gandhi said that he wasn't interested in marriage. Would this Salman Khurshid like to call Rahul Gandhi a Napumsak?

It was reported in The Economic Times of 6 February 2014 that Rahul Gandhi disapproved of personal attacks on Opposition leaders, indicating that the Congress leadership was not happy with Mani Shankar Aiyar's recent "chaiwala" jibe at BJP's Prime Ministerial candidate Narendra Modi. Salman Khurshid is accusing Narendra Modi of not being able to control his Ministers. Why couldn't Rahul Gandhi control his Ministers like Salman Khurshid?

The great Islamist Salman Khurshid had written in his book, ‘At Home In India: A restatement of Indian Muslims’ (P.115), that “Sikhs suffered in 1984 due to their SINS during 1947. (On the other hand) There was also a terrible satisfaction amongst Muslims, who had not completely forgotten the Partition’s unpleasant aftermath. Hindus and Sikhs were alike paying for their ‘sins’. They were paying for the blood they had drawn in 1947.”
Salman Khurshid with this barbaric remark has proved himself to be a blood-thirsty, Hindu-hating Islamist in the line of Muhammad Ali Jinnah (1876-1948) and Huseyn Shaheed Suhrawardy (1892-1963).

Faced by criticism, Rahul Gandhi said he does not appreciate 'impotent' remark made by Khurshid against Narendra Modi. I suppose Manish Tiwari would come on TV to say it is the personal view of Salman Khurshid and not that of the Party.

During an official Christian-Muslim meeting in Britain, an important Muslim delegate said calmly and self-assuredly: “Thanks to your democratic laws we will conquer you. Thanks to our religious laws, we will dominate you.”

“When we Muslims are in minority, we demand freedom in the name of your principle (Secularism), and when we Muslims are majority, we deny you the freedom in the name of our principle (Sharia)” This is the credo of Ahmed Patel and Salman Khurshid.

Moral of the Salman Khurshid outburst.
For the Moral of this narrative, I will have to quote again from Will Durant’s ‘The Story of Civilization’ again. Civilization is a precious good, whose delicate complex order and freedom can at any moment be overthrown by barbarians invading from without and multiplying from within. Eternal vigilance is the price of peace and freedom.

Narendra Modi must become the Prime Minister of India in 2014 with absolute majority in the Parliament, lest our children lose their freedom in the name of Sharia!

APENDIX:

List of MAJOR Riots / Incidents since 1947


Year

State(s)

Place

Numbers Massacred/ Killed
(Approx.)


Party in Power
1947
Punjab /
Bengal
Various
Min 5,00,000
(worst riots in human history)
Congress
1964
Bihar
Jamshedpur
2000
Congress
1967
Bihar
Ranchi
177
Jana Kranti Dal
1969
Gujarat
Ahmedabad
2000
Congress
1970
Maharashtra
Bhiwandi
164
Congress
1979
Bihar
Jamshedpur
108
Janata Party
1980
UP
Moradabad
200
Congress
1983
Assam
Nellie
2200 (official)
5000 (unofficial)
Congress
1984
Delhi/ Haryana
Delhi
4000
Congress
1985
Gujarat
Ahmedabad
275
Congress
1987
UP
Meerut
50
Congress
1989
Bihar
Bhagalpur
1150
Congress
1987 – to date
Jammu & Kashmir
Various
Over 60,000.
4,50,000 displaced (ethnic cleansing)
National Conference
 /Presidents Rule /
PDP / 
Congress /
Presidents Rule /
National Conference
1990
UP
Aligarh
150
Janata Dal
1990
Andhra
Pradesh
Hyderabad
300
Congress
1992
Gujarat
Surat
152
Congress + Allies
1992
UP
Kanpur
254
Presidents Rule
(Congress)
1992 / 1993
Maharashtra
Mumbai
900
Congress
1993
Maharashtra
Mumbai
250
Congress
2002
Gujarat
Godhra / Various
1200
BJP
2008
Maharashtra
Mumbai
164
Congress
2012
Assam
Kokrajhar
77
Congress

Ref:

http://www.aurangzeb.info/

http://www.hindunet.org/hindu_history/modern/temple_aurangzeb.html
Destruction of Hindu Temples by Aurangzeb
By Rajiv Varma

http://www.ivarta.com/columns/OL_040117.htm
Why Is Lalit Mansingh Misrepresenting Historical Facts? By: Narain Kataria

http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/?p=798
Chronicles: A Magazine of American Culture
India, Jihad’s Permanent Battleground by Srdja Trifkovic

http://www.ivarta.com/columns/OL_040117.htm
Why Is Lalit Mansingh Misrepresenting Historical Facts? By: Narain Kataria

http://home.gujarat.gov.in/homedepartment/downloads/godharaincident.pdf
Nanavati Report

http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2014-02-06/news/47090019_1_congress-vice-president-narendra-modi-rahul-gandhi
Rahul Gandhi disapproves of personal attacks on Opposition leaders





1 comment:

Narendra Kumar S.S said...

Good article. The Congress and its progeny should be defeated. The time is ripe and people have realized their mistake of last 60 years. BJP should get full majority on its own and take the country on a development track for next 10 years. After that, there will be no Congress. Mahatma Gandhi's last wish will be fulfilled. The party (Congress) started by a foreigner will be dissolved by a foreigner. We will put our best effort to make this happen.

I am posting a link from my blog and requesting your readers to read that article also:
Why Gujarati Muslims are with Modi? - http://ssnarendrakumar.blogspot.com/2014/04/why-gujarati-muslims-are-with-modi.html

Map