Prominent Persons Comments On The Moplah Rebellion

SECOND JIHAD AGAINST THE HINDUS OF MALABAR – Part 3


INDEX

1. THE MOPLAH REBELLION - Part I Second Jihad Against Hindus Of Malabar- Part 1

2. Petition of Malabar Ladies to Lady Reading
Second Jihad Against Hindus Of Malabar- Part 2

4. Malabar’s Agony - Article 1 Published on 29 November 1921

Prominent Persons Comments On The Moplah Rebellion

Moplah outrage upon a large number of peaceful, unarmed and unprepared Hindus can easily be corroborated by independent testimony.

A redoubtable source straight from the ground on which the Moplahs committed their atrocities was the proceedings of a conference held at Calicut presided over by the Zamorin of Calicut, the Ruler of Malabar. To quote:
“That the conference views with indignation and sorrow the attempts made at various quarters by interested parties to ignore or minimise the crimes committed by the rebels such as:
(a) Brutally dishonouring women
(b) Flaying people alive
(c) Wholesale slaughter of men, women and children
(d) Burning alive entire families
(e) Forcibly converting people in thousands and slaying those who refused to get converted
(f) Throwing half dead people into wells and leaving the victims to struggle for escape till finally released from their suffering by death
(g) Burning a great many and looting practically all Hindu and Christian houses in the disturbed areas in which even Moplah women and children took part and robbed women of even the garments on their bodies, in short reducing the whole non-Muslim population to abject destitution.
(h) Cruelly insulting the religious sentiments of the Hindus by desecrating and destroying numerous temples in the disturbed areas, killing cows within the temple precincts putting their entrails on the holy image and hanging skulls on the walls and the roofs.

Lord Reading, The Viceroy said: “A few European and many Hindus have been murdered, communications have been obstructed; government offices burnt and looted and public records have been destroyed. Hindu temples have been sacked and plundered, houses of Europeans and Hindus burnt. According to reliable reports Hindus were forcibly converted to Islam. One of the most fertile tracts of South India is faced with serious famine. The result has been the temporary collapse of the Civil Government and offices and courts have ceased to function and ordinary business has been brought to a standstill. European and Hindu refugees of all classes are concentrated at Calicut and it is satisfactory to note that they are safe there. One trembles to think of the consequences if the forces of order had not prevailed for the protection of Calicut. Those who are responsible for causing this grave outbreak of violence and crime must be brought to justice and made to suffer the punishment of the guilty.”

A statement refers to the misdeeds of the Muslim Moplahs in these words: "Their wanton and unprovoked attack on the Hindus, the all but wholesale looting of their houses in Ernad etc, the forcible conversion of Hindus in the beginning of the Moplah rebellion and the wholesale conversion of those who stuck to their homes in later stages, the brutal murder of inoffensive Hindus without the slightest reason except that they are “Kafirs” or belonged to the same religion as the policemen, who their mosques, burning of Hindu temples, the outrage on Hindu women and their forcible conversion and marriage by the Moplahs."

DURATMA GANDHI – A CRYPTO MUSLIM

This is how K R Phanda described Gandhi in the April 2008 issue of Jana Sangh Today, a monthly magazine of the Akhil Bharatiya Jana Sangh in New Delhi.

Gandhi’s slavish infatuation for the Moplahs was total. He remained unshaken because of his unctuous submissiveness for the barbarous Moplahs. He had nothing but total contempt for the peace- loving Hindus of India.

Contrast the slave-minded Gandhi with Vinayak Damodar Savarkar (1883-1966) an ardent freedom fighter, revolutionary and thinker who is credited with developing the Hindu nationalist political ideology called Hindutva. Savarkar was quite unconcerned about the Muslim reaction to his scheme. He was not perturbed by the Muslim refusal to join in the struggle for Swaraj. He was very conscious of the ancient spiritual strength of the Hindus and the organizing power of the Hindu Maha Sabha and proposed to carry on the struggle, immensely confident that, even alone and unaided, the Hindus will be able to wrest Swaraj from the British. Savarkar was quite prepared to say to the Musalmans: "If you come, with you, if you don't, without you; and if you oppose, in spite of you—the Hindus will continue to fight for their national freedom as best as they can." Contrast this with Gandhi, the alleged “apostle of nonviolence”, who on many occasions, decried forceful conversion as a terribly violent act. But regarding the forceful conversion by the Moplahs, he preferred to remain mum.

Gandhi, with his submissive mentality to the abusive Muslims, propagated the lie in ‘Young India’ that the Moplahs, during the said rampage, had converted only a single Hindu to Islam.

Most shamefully Gandhi described the killing of the innocent Hindus by the Moplahs as a heroic deed. In addition to that, he asked the Hindus, for the sake of humanity, not to retaliate.

M.K Gandhi with his twisted mind put forth his political thesis to the effect that every Muslim is a bully and every Hindu is a coward. This was the very basis of Gandhi's NON-VIOLENCE! Since, according to Gandhi, the Hindu was a coward who will refuse to fight, the Hindu might as well resort to verbal sophistry and high sounding philosophy and justify his lack of violence. Gandhi never believed that the Hindu is capable of fighting his oppressor, so he wanted the Hindus to make a virtue of their inability and unwillingness to fight! If you are a rape victim, then the next time you see the rapist, don't wait for the rapist to attack you, drop your pants, bend and wait for the rapist to come over and have his way with you. Gandhi's NON-VIOLENCE was nothing but 'GANDHIAN' COWARDICE in the face of the mindless Muslim violence!

Gandhi hid his cowardice under the quack doctrine of Non-Violence, which he took care only to preach to the Hindus and never to his Muslim “Brothers”. He believed himself liberal but was on actual fact afraid of Muslims and he consistently pleaded for the Muslims and pampered them. [‘Anti-Hindus’, by Prafull Goradia and K.R.Phanda. Contemporary Targett Prafull Private Limited, pages 4, 5.] Unfortunately for Gandhi and the Hindus of India, it was a stupid sort of one-sided unrequited love towards the Muslim marauders of India.

On the one hand he called every Hindu a coward and on the other hand he exhorted all the Hindus to remain calm and non-violent even when they were under attack by the marauding Muslims intent on slaughter, loot, gang-rapes and forced conversions. According to Shri V. Sundaram I.A.S,: “Gandhi demonstrated his readiness to sacrifice or sell out vital Hindu interests, Hindu honor and Hindu blood all the time in deference to the feelings of Muslims. Gandhi displayed all his courage only to suppress the Hindus. He was mortally scared of jihadi Muslims. So was Jawaharlal Nehru. Therefore Gandhi had no moral sanction to talk about the cowardice of the Hindus.”

“Gandhi represented the perpetrators of vile deeds as god-fearing people! Was it not a travesty of religion to described men who murder and rape in the name of religion as god-fearing? … Gandhi thus described the Moplah ferocity as the ignorant fanaticism of the Moplah brothers, and the Hindu mentality as cowardliness.” (Mahatma Gandhi, D Keer, pp-402).

Devoid of all sense of decency, propriety, honour and shame, Gandhi deplored the British colonial administration for taking stern action to suppress the savage Islamic jihad against the Hindus of Malabar conducted by the Moplahs.

A Muslim called Khlifa Haji Mehmud of Lurwani, Sindh, once said “Gandhi was really a Mohammedan” (D Keer, p-237).

There is no doubt that the treacherous Gandhi, by supporting the Moplahs, instigated the Muslims to launch attacks on the Hindus in Punjab, Bengal and in other places in the wake of partition. With all due apologies to Shakespeare, I would have to state that all the perfumes of Arabia would not wash the smell of innocent Malabar Hindu blood from Gandhi's hands!

“After the carnage by the Moplahs, “Maulana” Gandhi started raising money from common people to help, not the Hindu victims, but for the Muslim perpetrators. Many believe that it would have been immensely beneficial for the country, had Gandhi been assassinated at that time.” says Dr Radhasyam Brahmachari.

Mr M.K Gandhi gave this callous, sadistic and barbarous message he gave to the Hindu victims of Moplah rebellion in Young India of 29 September, 1921: “The ending of the Moplah revolt is a matter not only of urgency, but of simple humanity. The Hindus must have the courage and the faith to feel that they can protect their religion in spite of such fanatical eruptions. ... Be the Moplahs be ever so bad, they deserve to be treated as human beings.”

To quote the appropriate words of Prafull Goradia in this context: “For Gandhi, no price was too great for appeasing Muslims, so that they did not oppose Hindus. That he did not understand the Muslims was proved by the conduct of the Muslim League and by the vivisection of the country.” The price for Gandhi's Hindu-Muslim unity was always to be paid by the Hindus.

After the Mutiny of 1857, the incidence of Hindu-Muslim riots in India had come down sharply. By lending support to the Khilafat Movement of Ali Brothers in 1920, Gandhi inaugurated a new era of a fresh wave of Muslim violence on Hindus.

This inherent impending danger was clearly foreseen by Sir Chettur Sankaran Nair (1857-1934), a native of Malabar, President of Indian National Congress in 1897 and Law Member of the Viceroy’s Executive Council in 1922.

In his book prophetically titled as 'Gandhi and Anarchy' published by Tagore and Company, Madras in 1922 he wrote: 'It is impossible to believe that Gandhi and his adherents are not aware that this claim of the Mohammedans to be judged only by the Law of the Koran, is a claim which is the fons et origo of all Khilafat claims of whatever kind. It is well to be clear about this, for not only does the acceptance of the claim of Khilafat as regards India means a real denial of Swaraj, but it also involves Mohammedan rule and Hindu subjection."

During the Moplah rebellion in Kerala in 1921, thousands of Hindu men, women and children were killed by the Muslims. Hundreds of women were raped. And yet Gandhi supported the Moplahs and not the Hindu victims of Moplah violence and oppression. In fact Gandhi had no sympathy for the Hindus at all.

The great political fraud, the 'saintly' hypocrite, also known as the Mahatma, wrote in his 'Young India', “it is wrong to say that Islam has employed force. No religion in this world has spread through the use of force. No Musalman, to my knowledge, has ever approved of compulsion.” According to Gandhi, the Moplah Muslims were guilty of no crime absolutely!

“For sheer brutality on women, I do not remember anything in history to match the Malabar rebellion. It broke out on 20 August, 1921. Even by the 6 September, the results were dreadful. There was complete breakdown of Civil Government resulting in widespread disorder, in political chaos, in anarchy and in ruin.” wrote Sir Sankaran Nair.

Dr (Mrs.) Annie Besant wrote a series of articles in her journal 'New India' on 29 November and 6 December 1921 under the caption Malabar's Agony. Annie Besant (Unlike Mr M.K Gandhi) actually visited the affected areas of Malabar soon after the Moplah rebellion in 1921 and wrote a series of powerful articles about the carnage let loose by the Moplah Muslims which opened the eyes of the government of India and that of Britain. She challenged the stand taken by Mahatma Gandhi on the peaceful and humanitarian overtures of the Moplah Muslims towards non-Muslims in Malabar. I will reproduce her articles in my later posts.

The savagery of the Moplah riots evoked such widespread horror and revulsion that a Committee of Distinguished Citizens was appointed to tour the affected areas. The Committee consisted of K P Keshava Menon, Secretary Kerala Provincial Committee, T V Mohammed, Secretary, Ernad Khilafat Committee, K Madhavan Nair, Secretary, Calicut District Congress Committee and K V Gopal Menon. In their fact-finding report they concluded: “Truth is infinitely of more paramount importance than Hindu Muslim unity or Swaraj and therefore we tell the Maulana Sahib and his co-religionists and India's revered leader Mahatma Gandhi – if he too is unaware of the events here – that atrocities committed by the Moplahs on the Hindus are unfortunately too true and that there is nothing in the deeds of Moplah rebels which a true non-violent, non-co-operator can congratulate them for ... Their wanton and unprovoked attack on the Hindus, the all but wholesale looting of their houses in Ernad, Valluvanad, Poanmani and Calicut Tali; the forcible conversion of Hindus in a few places in the beginning of the rebellion and the wholesale conversion of those who stick to their homes in the later stages, the brutal murder of inoffensive Hindus, men, women and children in cold blood without the slightest reason except that they are Kafirs or belong to the same race as the policemen, who insulted their Tangals or entered their mosques, the desecration and burning of Hindu temples, the outrage on Hindu women and their forcible conversion and marriage by Moplahs; do these and similar atrocities proved beyond the shadow of a doubt by the statements recorded by us from the actual sufferers who have survived, deserve any congratulations? On the other hand, should they not call forth the strongest condemnation from all right minded men and more especially from a representative body of Mohamedans like the Khilafat conference pledged to non-violence under all provocation? Did the Moplahs, who committed such atrocities, sacrifice their lives in the cause of their religion?”

The Congress leaders disgraced themselves at first by disbelieving these heart-rending stories relating to Moplah atrocities, with Duratma Gandhi leading the Anti-Hindu and Pro- Moplah Brigade!’

At the insistence of Duratma Gandhi the Working Committee of the Congress shamelessly whitewashed the criminal atrocities committed by the Moplah Muslims against the Hindus of Malabar by passing the following resolution:
“The Working Committee places on record its sense of deep regret over the deeds of violence done by Moplahs in certain areas of Malabar, these deeds being evidence of the fact that there are still people in India who have not understood the message of the Congress and the Central Khilafat Committee, and calls upon every Congress and Khilafat worker to spread the message of non-violence even under the gravest provocation throughout the length and breadth of India. Whilst, however, condemning violence on the part of the Moplas, the working Committee desires it to be known that the evidence in its possession shows that provocation beyond endurance was given to the Moplas and that the reports published by and on behalf of the Government have given a one-sided and highly exaggerated account of the wrongs done by the Moplas and an understatement of the needless destruction of life resorted to by the Government in the name of peace and order.”

Swami Shradhanand (1856-1926) an Arya Samaj missionary who played a key role on the Hindu Sangathan (consolidation) and the Shuddhi (re-conversion) reform movement had a weekly journal called the ‘Liberator’. Swami Shradhanand wrote in the Liberator of 26th August 1926: "The original resolution condemned the Moplas wholesale for the killing of Hindus and burning of Hindu homes and the forcible conversion to Islam. The Hindu members themselves proposed amendments till it was reduced to condemning only certain individuals who had been guilty of the above crimes. But some of the Moslem leaders could not bear this even. Maulana Fakir and other Maulanas, of course, opposed the resolution and there was no wonder. But I was surprised, an out-and-out Nationalist like Maulana Hasrat Mohani opposed the resolution on the ground that the Mopla country no longer remained Dar-ul-Aman but became Dar-ul-Harab and they suspected the Hindus of collusion with the British enemies of the Moplas. Therefore, the Moplas were right in presenting the Quran or sword to the Hindus. And if the Hindus became Mussalmans to save themselves from death, it was a voluntary change of faith and not forcible conversion—Well, even the harmless resolution condemning some of the Moplas was not unanimously passed but had to be accepted by a majority of votes only.

Though the Subjects Committee meeting proposed to condemn out right the Moplah violence, the resolution finally adopted by the Congress Working Committee put the blame of “provocation beyond endurance given to the Moplahs” on the unarmed Hindus who were disembowelled, dismembered and done to death.

SO ACCORDING TO THE CONGRESS, THE MERE FACT THAT A HINDU IS ALIVE AND BREATHING IS A “PROVOCATION BEYOND ENDURANCE” GIVEN TO THE MUSLIMS, WHO NOW CAN NOW EXERCISE THE DESERT MOON-GOD ALLAH-GIVEN AND DURATMA GANDHI-APPROVED RIGHT TO MASSACRE THE HINDU MAN AND RAPE THE HINDU WOMAN.

At the annual session of the Khilafat Conference in 1923, the President of the session, Maulana Shaukat Ali, the "Muslim Brother" of our so-called Mahatma, praised the Moplahs for their jihad or Islamic religious violence against the Kaffir Hindus. Then the Maulana Shaukat Ali, concealing his Islamic pride, concedes that “some Hindus may have suffered at the hands of the Moplahs”, but then he quickly claims that this horrific event is a "closed book" and publicly announced loud and clear that he and his brother Maulana Muhammad Ali would provide for the maintenance of Moplah orphans.

The Hindus in the Congress did not come forward to help the victims of the Muslim genocide against the Hindus. The Congress Hindus did not want to be labeled “communal”, their minds being so thoroughly enslaved by the evangelical British colonials and their Macaulayized English education that the Congress Dhimmi Hindus felt it a crime to help a suffering fellow Hindu.

Through their Suddhi Movement, the Arya Samaji converted over 2000 Hindus who had been forcibly converted to Islam by the Moplahs. However their leader, the Venerable Swami Shraddhananda had to pay with his life for this service to Sanatana Dharma. The aged Swami was stabbed on 23 December 1926 by another of Gandhi’s “loved Muslim Brothers”, one Islamic terrorist named Abdul Rashid.

On 19 November 1921, about 100 Moplah prisoners were sent by train from Malabar to Coimbatore. They were packed in goods wagons which, of course, had no ventilation. So, when the doors were opened after a five hours’ journey, the prisoners were found to be in a state of collapse, with horrible wounds inflicted by bites and bows in one another by the struggling men. In all, 82 men died. The Congress, which on hearing from its own Committee about the genocide on the Hindus of Malabar by the savage Moplahs glossed over that horror with a mere pat on the back for the Hindu victims was outraged at the treatment the Muslim Moplah mass murderers and rapists received at the hands of the British Indian Police! The Congress immediately passed a resolution declaring that it was ‘an act of inhumanity unheard of in modern times and unworthy of a Government that calls itself civilized’.

While commenting on Gandhi and his policy of Muslim appeasement, behind the façade of non-violence, Sri Aurobindo once said, "India will be free to the extent it succeeds in shaking off the spell of Gandhism."

The matter did not end here. Due to perpetual insistence by the treacherous Gandhi, the Moplah rogues, who died in police encounter, were later on declared martyrs of the freedom struggle and were allowed to receive allowance, like other freedom fighters, from the government exchequer, after independence and the practice is still in vogue.

The Muslim fanatics who were at the front of the Hindu massacre during the course of the Moplah Rebellion are now christened as freedom fighters and comrades, respectively, by the Congress-led coalition as well as the Communist traitor coalition of political parties in Kerala.

E.M.S Namboothiripad, the Chinese stooge and Marxist traitor in Kerala, created Malappuram as a Muslim-majority district in Kerala, so that the jihadis could start their next partition of India unhindered.

The traitor then gave the genocidal Moplah jihadi rebellion a Marxist class struggle cover by painting that Second Jihad against the Hindus of Malabar as an agrarian labour unrest!!! AGRARIAN LABOUR UNREST, MY BLOODY FOOT!!!

Following the tradition set by masochist Gandhi, the so called secular politicians and liberal English media in Mumbai observe Moplah Day every year and take out procession and hold public meetings in honour of the savages who raped the mothers and grandmothers of the Hindus in Malabar.

According to Smt. K.P Sasikala Teacher, President of Hindu Aikya Vedi, Kerala, “Using public funds the Marxists built memorials for the genocidal jihadi rape-warriors of Moplah Rebellion.
The Hindus of Malabar who have seen
    their mothers and sisters raped and carried away as sex slaves,
    their fathers and older male relatives flayed alive, burnt alive,
        dismembered, disemboweled and done to death
    have, now, to perforce, walk past the State-Funded Memorials to jihadi aggressors, with their heads bent in eternal humiliation and indelible disgrace”.

If the Muslim marauders gang-rape the Hindu women and slaughter the Hindu men en masse, then it is merely due to their "non-understanding the message of the Congress", but if those Muslim rape-warriors get their just dues at the hands of Destiny, the Congress reacts in horror! So it seems the anti-Hindu "Secularism" of the Congress has come down from the pre-Independence times.

The political leader who clearly saw through the Islam-embracing game of Mahatma Gandhi in the years before our independence was Dr B R Ambedkar.

Dr B R Ambedkar described the Muslim Appeasement of Gandhi succinctly: “Gandhi has never called the Muslims to account even when they have been guilty of gross crimes against Hindus. It is a notorious fact that many prominent Hindus who had offended the religious susceptibilities of the Muslims either by their writings or by their part in the Shudhi Movement have been murdered by some fanatic Musalmans. The leading Muslims never condemned these criminals. On the contrary, they were hailed as religious martyrs.... This attitude of the Muslims is understandable. What is not understandable is the attitude of Mr. Gandhi”

Bombay High Court wants Shiv Sena to pay for riots

Government of Maharashtra in 2007 banned a book titled ‘ISLAM: A Concept of Political World Invasion By Muslims’ authored by Shri R.V Bhasin, a senior Advocate of the Supreme Court of India. The ban was in violation of Section 468 of the CrPC which states that a book can be banned within a period of 3 years and no later. The Bombay Shariat High Court upheld the illegal ban. It was the Islamically appropriate thing to do. (See the article by V. Sundaram I.A.S on the Bhasin case.

http://ennapadampanchajanya.blogspot.com/2010/02/illegal-ban-on-freedom-of-speech-and.html)

We have Sharia-compliant Islamic Banking in the Communist Party (Muslim) CPM controlled Allah's own Kerala. Now we have this Sharia-compliant Islamic Bombay High Court asked former Shiv Sena MLA Sitaram Dalvi to find out from his party "bosses" if they were ready to pay for the damage caused to a hotel's property here during an agitation.

During Ganesh Chaturthi festival some Nationalist-minded Hindus displayed posters of Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaj slaying the Islamic marauder Afzal Khan. On 3 September 2009, Muslims in Miraj (Sangali, Maharashtra) took objection to the poster depicting the slaying of Afzal Khan and started rioting. The Muslim rioters immediately destroyed 3 Lord Ganesh idols and attacked the Hindu worshippers in the area. When the Hindus dispersed the Muslim rioters attacked the Police who were spectators till then.
-One Tata Sumo of the Police, one Tata Indica of a citizen & another four wheeler were damaged by the rioting Muslims.
-Muslim youth hoisted their Green flag on the top of SP (Superintendent of Police) Krushna Prakash's van and that impotent man just watched and did nothing.

-The Police arrested the Shiv Sena & other Pro-Hindu leaders stating the reason as being violation of the `Code of conduct'. The ‘Code of Conduct’ formulated by the Islamic Bombay Police states that the Dhimmi Hindus who are second class citizens of India must drop their pants, bend over and take any abuse from the Islamic marauders, whether home grown or imported.

The Islamic Bombay High Court did not then ask the Muslims of Miraj to pay the cost of damages to public property. But the Sharia Learned Judges of the Bombay Islamic High Court believe that only the Hindu political party, the Shiv Sena must pay for damages to public property and not the Muslim rioters. After all it is the Kuranic prerogative of the Muslims in India to riot at the slightest provocation even though they had sought and obtained a separate Dar-ul-Islam homeland for themselves in Pakistan after a large-scale slaughter of Hindus during the Muslim League's DIRECT ACTION in 1946 and after.

I am sure the Sharia Learned Judges of the Bombay Islamic High Court will do their counterparts in Saudi Arabia proud.

The political party ruling the Government of Maharashtra and the Union Government will surely elevate these judges to the Supreme Court.

Human Right commission stays award to Anti Hindu Novel on Draupadi

The pseudo-secularist anti-Hindus efforts to denigrate and rundown the Hindu faith and practices have to be admired at least for their unabating and untiring perseverance. Do any of the so-called “Hindu fanatics” bother to keep up relentless salvos against the enemies of Sanatana Dharma?

What triggered this post is the following news item:
Yarlagadda Lakshmi Prasad's book that defames Draupadi has been selected for a Central Sahitya Akademi award. Selection panel constituted by Congress (Italian) had purposefully nominated this novel which denigrates Draupadi who is an iconic feminine character and an ardent devotee of Lord Krishna to hurt the sentiments of Hindus. One of the main objections raised by the concerned Hindu organizations is the interpretation of Draupadi as someone who forever craves for carnal pleasures.

Following strong protests and complaint filed by from Hindu organisations headed by Prajna Bharati, the Human Right Commission sought explanation from the AP Government. The Human Right Commission has also stayed the Award function proposed on February 16.

Y.L Prasad who holds Ph.Ds in Hindi and Telugu from Andhra University. He was close to NTR and became a Rajya Sabha MP in 1996. This man who was awarded a Padmashri in 2003 for Literature & Education could not resist a dig at a highly revered character like Draupadi, who is one of the Panchakanyaka. Draupadi, Ahalya, Mandodari, Sita and Tara are remembered by Hindu married ladies as the epitomes of chastity. These five noble ladies set the highest standards of conduct for a chaste Hindu lady. So then why am I not surprised at the sense of outrage among the Hindu people when the highly revered Draupadi is depicted as a nymphomaniac?

Let me say a few words about this Draupadi in question.
King Yajnasena Drupada of the Panchaala Kingdom with Kampilya as the capital had a fiery daughter, “a dark-skinned, stately, wondrously beautiful maiden” known variously as Krishnaa, Kalyani, Panchaali and Draupadi. The King had two sons Dhristadyumna and Satyajit.

King Drupada was captured by the master archer Arjuna and his four brothers in a sudden surprise attack and brought before the vindictive Dronacharya who compelled the King to make a humiliating apology for an earlier slight and also confiscated the Panchala lands north of Ganga River. King Drupada’s whole life was poisoned by this bitter memory and all he lived for was to avenge it. He also transmitted this burning passion of his life to his children. To avenge their father’s humiliation was the mission of their lives too. Princess Draupadi had set her heart of marrying the most redoubtable warrior in the whole of Aryavarta who can destroy Dronacharya. Such was her iron determination to avenge her father’s humiliation that she was known as the “Daughter of Drupada” rather then her own given name.

Fast forward to the time of Draupadi Swayamvaram. Arjuna, in the guise of an anchorite, won the stiff archery test at the Swayamvaram and won the heart and hand of Princess Draupadi. Kunti, the senior wife of late Emperor Pandu, not knowing that the five brothers, the Pandavas are bringing home the Princess of Panchaala, unthinkingly asked the brothers to share what ever they brought equally among themselves.

When Empress Madri died on the funeral pyre of her husband Emperor Pandu she left her two young sons in the care of the Empress Kunti. The three sons of Kunti and the two sons of Madri pledged to honour and obey the words of Mother Kunti under all circumstances. Mother Kunti lived her life to keep the five brothers, the Pandavas, united and strong. Her wish was their command.

The Pandavas, the five brothers and their mother Empress Kunti wanted Princess Draupadi to marry all five brothers. In Hindu households, it is the older son who marries first then the younger sons. Arjuna too felt that older brothers Yudhisthtira and Bhima had to marry first before he married. The only solution they found was for all the five brothers to marry Princess Draupadi. This solution was opposed by King Drupada, Prince Dhristadyumna and Princess Draupadi.

King Drupada, Prince Dhristadyumna and Princess Draupadi were very much against Princess Draupadi marrying the five brothers. They felt it was gross adharma. It would bring stigma to the entire family.

Maharishi Veda Vyasa was invited to the confabulation to sort out the royal mess! Veda Vyasa, the fountainhead of Dharma, The Best of Munis, counseled as follows: A dedicated wife is the root from which spring strength and discipline which make life righteous. The divine sages have ordained that a family should revolve around a dedicated wife. If she falls the family falls with her. Chaos reigns. So they decreed that one wife be dedicated to one husband. This is DHARMA. To tackle unforeseen calamities the ancient sages have also sanctified unfamiliar ways in extraordinary circumstances. This is the APADDHARMA.

One such APADDHARMA is niyoga. A childless widow can approach the brother of her deceased husband to beget a child for her and continue the family line.

Another APADDHARMA is for a woman to marry more than one brother to avoid a calamity. Such marriages prove successful if the wife is wise and the husbands considerate. She has to give equal dedication to all of her husbands.

In days gone by, Jatilaa, the daughter of Sage Gautama, one of the Saptarishis, was married to seven brothers who were rishis.
King Havirdhana of the royal lineage of King Prithu had ten sons who were known as Prachetas. These ten were all righteous men famous for performing severe austerities and meditation. The Prachetas brothers had one wife among all of them.

Rejecting Yudhisthtira’s solution would mean that Draupadi would become a rejected bride whom few noble warriors would care to win. By this King Drupada would have also broken his vow of marrying his daughter to the winner of the swayamvara test, thereby putting him to shame before kings and nobles. Demanding that only Arjuna marry her would result in separating Arjuna from his mother and his powerful brothers. That would weaken her husband Arjuna.

By marrying the five brothers, the motherless Draupadi would get a loving and dedicated mother, Kunti. The five brothers – loving and considerate – united in word and deed, their strength cemented by her undivided devotion will either rule the Kurus or establish an empire for themselves. By marrying the five brothers Draupadi would be serving Dharma whose instruments they were. This was the counsel of Maharishi Veda Vyasa to Princess Draupadi. The wise princess chose to follow the sage’s advice. He father King Drupada was known as one of the pillars of Dharma in Aryavarta and Princess Draupadi would be no different. That is why she is counted among the highly revered PANCHAKANYAKAS.

Muni Yaja, Muni Upayaja and Bhagawaan Sri Krishna who were present at the confabulations between the Panchalas and the Pandavas concurred with the opinion of the Maharishi Veda Vyasa.

I have drawn most of the material in the above narration from Dr Kanhaiyalal Maneklal Munshi’s book ‘Krishnavatara’ Volume III [Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan, Edition 2006]

According to B.S Bisht, The Khasas of Jaunsar-Bawar (Dehra Dun District) are a polyandrous community. In the Mahabharata the Khasaas are expressly mentioned among the northern tribes who brought presents to Yudhisthira. Many important sites in Jaunsar-Bawar have associations with Pandavas and they even have temples dedicated to the Pandavas. In Jaunsar-Bawar, the bride generally goes through a marriage ceremony with the eldest of the brothers but becomes the wife of all of them. In Bawar every brother has a day allotted to him for consorting with his wife. The Khasa wife enjoys all sorts of privileges, respect, affection and love of the family members as well as of the community. At present the fraternal polygamy is changing to bi-polyandry, monogamy and polygamy.

So why this belittlement of Hindu icons, faith, beliefs and practices? In the powerful words of Maanoj Rakhit in his trailblazing book ‘Christianity in a Different Light: Face Behind the Mask’ [3rd Ed May/June 2005], Christians could not tolerate the existence of a superior civilization on the face of this Earth and they had to conspire to wipe it out totally.

Christian Briton slowly and systematically eradicated the ancient and egalitarian ancient system of education established in vedic times and replaced it with a costly and elitist system of education which reduced this ancient nation to a colony of clerks and peons. Today’s convent educated “secular” Hindus are actually crypto-Christian, Anti-Hindus acting as a deadly traitorous fifth column rendering the nation defenceless and destroying it from within.

A product of this British colonial Christianising education, Jawaharlal Nehru declared in a shameless manner: “By education, I am an Englishman, by views, an internationalist, by culture, a Muslim, and I am a Hindu only by accident of birth”.

YARLAGADDA LAKSHMI PRASAD, ANOTHER PRODUCT OF MACAULAY’S BRITISH CHRISTIAN COLONIAL EDUCATION, FOLLOWS THE MIND-SLAVE TRADITION OF JAWAHARLAL NEHRU.

Let not Lakshmi Prasad forget the fact that M.F Hussein, the jihadi paint brush warrior, who had likewise hurt the religious feelings of Hindus through his pornographic paintings of Draupadi, is now hiding in exile outside India, despite the best efforts of the anti-Hindu "secular" forces to bring him back to this country.

India’s contribution to various branches of knowledge and wisdom was denied in the past by the British as well as many Indian historians working under the British Raj and British influence. But why has this attitude not changed even after independence? With the introduction of Macaulay system of education in 1835 the enslavement of the Indian mind began and it continues to be so even today --- even after 63 years of our partitioned independence.

Readers may want to refer to the detailed review by Sri V. Sundaram I.A.S (Retd.) of the book written by two intellectual Kshatriyas Professor Makhan Lal and Professor Rajendra Dixit in their outstanding book titled ‘EDUCATING TO CONFUSE AND DISRUPT: Defiling History and Education System of India’ [India First Foundation, New Delhi.]. http://www.newstodaynet.com/col.php?section=20&catid=33&id=20121

Petition of Malabar Ladies to Lady Reading

SECOND JIHAD AGAINST HINDUS OF MALABAR - PART 2

INDEX


1. THE MOPLAH REBELLION - Part I
Second Jihad Against Hindus Of Malabar- Part 1

2. Petition of Malabar Ladies to Lady Reading
Second Jihad Against Hindus Of Malabar- Part 2

3. Prominent Persons Comments On The Moplah Rebellion Second Jihad Against Hindus Of Malabar- Part 3

4. Malabar’s Agony - Article 1 Published on 29 November 1921


When thousands of Hindu women were raped and many of them killed by the Moplah Muslims during the Moplah rebellion in August-September 1921, the brutalised women of Malabar led by the senior Rani of Nilambur gave a heart-rending petition to Lady Reading, the wife of Lord Reading, the then Viceroy of India.



Taken from Chapter 5 titled ‘Moplahs’ of the book ANTI-HINDUS by Prafull Goradia and K. R Phanda [2003 ed.]

Petition of Malabar Ladies to Lady Reading



To
Her GRACIOUS EXCELLENCY
THE COUNTESS OF READING,
Delhi.

The humble memorial of the bereaved and sorrow-stricken women of Malabar.

MAY IT PLEASE YOUR GRACIOUS AND COMPASSIONATE LADYSHIP.

We, the Hindu women of Malabar of varying ranks and stations in life
who have recently been overwhelmed by the tremendous catastrophe known as the Moplah Rebellion, take the liberty to supplicate your Ladyship for sympathy and succour.

Your Ladyship is doubtless aware that though our unhappy district has witnessed many Moplah outbreaks in the course of the last one hundred years, the present rebellion is unexampled in its magnitude as well as unprecedented in its ferocity.

But it is possible that your Ladyship is not fully apprised
  of all the horrors and atrocities perpetrated by the fiendish rebels;
  of the many wells and tanks filled up with the mutilated,
    but often only half dead bodies of our nearest and dearest ones who refused
    to abandon the faith of our fathers;
  of pregnant women cut to pieces and left on the roadsides and in the jungles,
    with the unborn babe protruding from the mangled corpse;
  of our innocent and helpless children torn from our arms and
    done to death before our eyes and
  of our husbands and fathers tortured, flayed and burnt alive;
  of our hapless sisters forcibly carried away from the midst of kith and kin
    and subjected to every shame and outrage which
    the vile and brutal imagination of these inhuman hell-hounds could conceive of;
  of thousands of our homesteads reduced to cinder-mounds
    out of sheer savagery and a wanton spirit of destruction;
  of our places of worship desecrated and destroyed and
  of the images of the deity shamefully insulted
    by putting the entrails of slaughtered cows where flower garlands used to lie
    or else smashed to pieces;
  of the wholesale looting of hard-earned wealth of generations
    reducing many who were formerly rich and prosperous
    to publicly beg for a piece or two in the streets of Calicut,
    to buy salt or chilly or betel-leaf —
    rice being mercifully provided by the various relief agencies.
These are not fables.

The wells full of rotting skeletons,
  the ruins which once were our dear homes,
  the heaps of stones which once were our places of worship —
  these are still here to attest to the truth.
The cries of our murdered children in their death agonies
  are still ringing in our ears and will continue to haunt our memory
  till death brings us peace.
We remember how driven out of our native hamlets
  we wandered starving and naked in the jungles and forests.
We remember how we choked and stifled our babies' cries
  lest the sound should betray our hiding places to our relentless pursuers.

We still vividly realise the moral and spiritual agony that thousand of us passed through when
  we were forcibly converted into the faith professed by these blood thirsty miscreants;
  we still have before us the sight of the unendurable and
  life long misery of those — fortunately few — of our most unhappy sisters
  who born and brought up in respectable families
  have been forcibly converted and then married to convict coolies.
For five long months not a day has passed without its dread tale of horror to unfold.

Your gracious Ladyship's distracted memorialists have endeavoured without exaggeration,
  without setting down aught in malice to convey
  at least some idea of the indescribably terrible agonies
  which they and thousands more of their sisters have been enduring for over five months now
  through this reign of inhuman (rightfulness inaugurated and carried on in the name of the Khilafat.
We have briefly referred without going into their harrowing details
  to our heartrending tale of   dishonour, outrage, rapine, and desolation.

But if the past has been one of pain and anguish, the future is full of dread and gloom.
We have to return to a ruined and desolated land.
Our houses have been burnt or destroyed;
  many of our breadwinners killed; all our property looted; our cattle slaughtered.
Repatriation without compensation means for us ruin, beggary, starvation.
Will not the benign Government come to our aid and
  give us something to help us to begin life anew?
We are now asked to settle down as paupers in the midst of the execrable fiends
  who robbed, insulted and murdered our loved ones —
  veritable demons such as hell itself could not let loose.
Many of us shrink from the idea of going back to what there is left of our homes;
  for though the armed bands and rebels have been dispersed
  the rebellion cannot be said to be entirely quelled.
It is like a venomous serpent whose spine has been partly broken,
  but whose poison fangs are still intact and
  whose striking power, if diminished, has not been destroyed.
  A few thousands of rebels have been killed and a few more thousands have been imprisoned,
  but as the Government are only too well aware many more thousands of rebels, looters, savagely
  militant evangelists and other inhuman monsters yet remain at large, a few in concealment,
  but most, moving about with arrogance openly threatening reprisals on all non-Moslims
  who dare to return and resume possession of their property.
Many refugees who went back have paid for their temerity with their lives.
In fact, repatriation, if it is not to be a leap from the frying pan into the fire,
   must mean for the vast bulk of your Ladyship's
  impoverished and helpless memorialists and their families
  a hard inexorable problem of financial help, and
  adequate protection against renewed hellish outrages from which
  immunity would be utterly impossible as long as
  thousands of men and even women and children of this semi-savage and fanatical race
  in whom the worst instinct of earth hunger, blood-lust and rapine
  have been awakened to fierce activity- are fret' to prey upon
  their peaceable and inoffensive neighbours who — let it be most respectfully emphasised —
  because of their implicit trust
  in the power and the will of a just and benign Government to protect them,
  had suffered their own art and capacity for self defense to emasculate and decay.

We, Your Ladyship's humble and sorrow-stricken memorialists do not seek vengeance.
Our misery will not be rendered less
  by inflicting similar misery upon this barbarous and savage race;
  our dead will not return to us if their slayers are slaughtered.
We would not be human, however, if we could ever forget
  the cruel and shameful outrages and indignities perpetrated upon us
  by a race to which we have always endeavoured to be friendly and neighbourly!
We would be hypocritical if, robbed of all our possessions
  we did not plead for some measure of compensation
  to help us out of the pauperism now forced upon us;
  we would be imbecile, if knowing the ungovernable, anti-social propensities and
  the deadly religious fanaticism of the Moplah race
  we did not entreat the just and powerful government
  to protect the lives and honour of our humble sisters
  who have to live in the rebel-ravaged zone.
Our ambition after all is low enough;
  sufficient compensation to save us and our children from starvation, and
  enough military protection against massacre and outrage are all that we want.
We beseech Your Compassionate Ladyship to exercise all the benevolent influence
  that you possess with the government to see that our humble prayers are granted.
But if the benign Government does not consider it possible
  to compensate us and to protect us in our native land
  we would most fervently pray that free grants of land may be assigned to us
  in some neighbouring region which though less blessed
  with the lavish gifts of nature may also be less cursed
  by the cruelty and brutality of man.

We beg to remain. Your Ladyship's most humble and obedient servants,

Next: Prominent Persons Comments On The Moplah Rebellion

SECOND JIHAD AGAINST THE HINDUS OF MALABAR – Part 1

SECOND JIHAD AGAINST THE HINDUS OF MALABAR

INDEX

1. THE MOPLAH REBELLION - Part I
Second Jihad Against Hindus Of Malabar- Part 1

2. Petition of Malabar Ladies to Lady Reading
SecondJihad Against Hindus Of Malabar- Part 2

3. Prominent Persons Comments On The Moplah Rebellion Second Jihad Against Hindus Of Malabar- Part 3

4. Malabar’s Agony - Article 1 Published on 29 November 1921

I had earlier written about the FIRST JIHAD AGAINST THE HINDUS OF MALABAR – The Mysorian invasion by the treacherous usurper Hyder Ali and his megalomaniac and Islamic fundamentalist son Tippu Sultan. A very peaceful and advanced Hindu civilization existent in Malabar was brought to naught by the barbarian Muslim invaders who brought with them extreme savagery and inhuman cruelty. The Hindu population of Malabar was driven out by torture and jihadi persecution, their wealth looted, their women gang raped, kidnapped and sold into slavery, their temple riches looted and their temple lands forcibly acquired and handed over to the Jihadis.

The SECOND JIHAD AGAINST THE HINDUS OF MALABAR was the MOPLAH REBELLION.

THE MOPLAH REBELLION - Part I

Mr Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi’s first decisive act of Muslim appeasement was the launching of Khilafat Movement in India in 1921. The movement aimed at the restoration of the Sultan on the throne of Turkey as the Khalifa, or the representative of Prophet Muhammad as the spiritual and temporal head of all Sunni Islam.

In the First World War, as it is well known, the Ottoman Empire was defeated and it's extensive, though decrepit, Arab and African empire was disbanded. The Treaty of Lausanne (23rd July 1923) recognized the new Republic of Turkey as the successor state of the defunct Ottoman Empire. The Ottaman Sultan deposed and forced to renounce his position as Khalifa on 3 March 1924.

The Khilafat Movement in a pan-Islamist move aimed at restoration of the deposed Sultan of Turkey to the position of Khalifa. In India, two Muslim bigots Muhammad Ali and Shaukat Ali went around barking loudly about restoring the Khilafat. For them the Khalifa represented and provided the means to bring about unity among the Indian Muslims. For the Ali Brothers the restoration of the Khalifa also meant restoration of the supremacy of the minority Muslim in India. At that time the Khilafat Movement consisted of only these two yahoos.

Now enters the fanatic Muslim-appeaser Gandhi who thought this Khilafat Agitation to be an excellent opportunity to curry favour to the violent and therefore hated Muslims on his side in the fight against the British Raj. He then entered the Khilafat Movement with much gusto and even dragged the trusting Congress Party and the gullible Hindus into it, breathing life into an otherwise desultory movement. The Ali Brothers and other Muslim leaders were delighted to have Gandhi leading the Hindus into the Movement to save the throne of their Muslim Religious leader, the Caliph. This, in their view would lead to the establishment of Muslim rule in India.

To understand the confusion in Gandhi’s mind one just has to read Dr B.R Ambedkar’s book Writings & Speeches, Pakistan or the Partition of India, Volume 8, published by the Education Department, Government of Maharashtra, 1990. Gandhi’s comment is as follows:
“In their impatient anger, the Mussalmans ask for more energetic and prompt action by the Congress and the Khilafat organizations. To the Mussalmans, Swaraj means, as it must mean, India’s ability to deal effectively with the Khilafat question. The Mussalmans, therefore, decline to wait if the attainment of Swaraj means indefinite delay of a programme that may require the Mussalmans of India to become impotent witnesses of the extinction of Turkey in the European waters.”

You see here the conceptual confusion of Gandhi. According to Gandhi, Muslims interpret the word Swaraj only as they must interpret according to him! “It is impossible not to sympathise with this attitude. I would gladly recommend immediate action if I could think of any effective course. I would gladly ask for postponement of Swaraj activity if thereby we could advance the interest of Khilafat. I could gradually take up measures outside non-cooperation, if I could think of any, in order to assuage the pain caused to the millions of the Mussalmans.”

So Gandhi not only realizes the extraterritorial loyalties of the Muslims but also condones it!!

“But, in my humble opinion, attainment of Swaraj is the quickest method of righting the Khilafat wrong. Hence it is that for me the solution of the Khilafat question is attainment of Swaraj and vice versa.”

Now Gandhi confuses not only himself but every one else in the hapless Congress party with his confusion. Gandhi puts the Restoration of the decadent Khalipha on the Ottaman throne at the same level as the national imperative of Indian Independence from British Empire!!

For Gandhi, Swaraj was the same as Restoration of the Khalifa and for the Muslims, Swaraj was the same as Restoration of the Khalifa which was in turn the same as Restoration of the Muslim Supremacy in India. Khilafat Movement and Gandhi’s participation along with the Congress created a misunderstanding among the Muslims that Swaraj meant a Hindu submission to the establishment of Muslim Rule. The disastrous consequences of this misunderstanding would be felt all over in India, but it was first felt in Malabar, as we shall see later in this article.

Swami Shradhananda (1856-1926) had a weekly journal called the ‘Liberator’. He was an Indian educationist, an Arya Samaj missionary and he played a key role on the Hindu Sangathan (consolidation) and the Shuddhi (re-conversion) a Hindu reform movement in 1920s. In the 'Liberator' issue of July 1926 the Swamiji wrote thus: “There was another prominent fact to which I drew the attention of Mahatma Gandhi. Both of us went together one night to the Khilafat Conference at Nagpur. The Ayats (verses) of the Quran recited by the Maulanas on that occasion, contained frequent references to Jihad and killing of the Kaffirs.But when I drew his attention to this phase of the Khilafat movement, Mahatmaji smiled and said, ‘They are alluding to the British Bureaucracy.’ In reply I said that it was all subversive of the idea of non-violence and when the reversion of feeling came the Mahomedan Maulanas would not refrain from using these verses against the Hindus.” But Gandhi said nothing by way of remonstrance to the Mahomedan Maulanas. What are a few or for that matter, several Hindus killed or converted as long as Gandhi had his way! The seeds of Moplah Jihad against the Hindus of Malabar were sown by the Mahomedan Maulanas in Gandhi's Khilafat movement and the psychotic Gandhi was looking on with that famous toothless beatific smile.

Why blame only the Ali Brothers for their Pan-Islamism when Gandhi was trying to outdo these Muslim fanatics in Muslim fanaticism?
In the midst of peaceful Hindus Gandhi out did them in peacefulness and in the midst of Muslim fanatics he wanted to be a greater Muslim fanatic.
So if Gandhi went to a wedding, he had to be the bride,
if Gandhi went to a religious function, he had to be the deity and
if Gandhi went to a funeral, he had to be the corpse!!!
His gargantuan ego would not allow it otherwise!!!

Let’s get back to the unwashed Maulanas where we had left them. The Ali Brothers had more than once affirmed their loyalty to the doctrine of PAN-ISLAMISM. Mohammed Ali in 1921 addressed a letter to Amanulla, the Amir of Afghanistan, inviting him to invade India. Unlike the pusillanimous UPA Government in India today, the British Government reacted in an effective way by arresting the traitorous Ali Brothers.

The following statement of Mohammed Ali before the Jury in the Sessions Court with regard to his stand vis-a-vis the Afghan invasion only confirmed his complicity:
“If His Majesty the Amir of Afghanistan is impelled by the same religious motive to contemplate Jehad against those who are in wrongful occupation of the Jazirutal-Arab and the holy places;' who aim at the weakening of Islam and deny to us the full freedom to advocate its cause,'then the clear law of Islam requires that no Mussalman should render any assistance against the Amir, and if the Jehad approaches his region every Mussalman must join the Mujahidin and assist them to the best of his or her power”.

When Mahatma Gandhi gave a call in 1921 for the burning of foreign cloth by calling it a religious duty of all Indians, all the great leaders like Rajaji, Motilal Nehru, C R Das and millions of our countrymen made bonfire of English cloth. However Gandhi’s “loved Mussalman Ali Brothers” of the Khilafat Movement organized the despatch of foreign clothes from the houses of Indian Muslims for the use of their Muslim brethren in Turkey. For the Ali Brothers of the Khilafat Movement, it was the national Khilafat duty of India to die for Turkey but not vice versa!! The loyalty of the Gandhi’s “loved Mussalman Ali Brothers”, Maulana Mohammad Ali and Maulana Shaukat Ali was always to Turkey and not to India. Gandhi always overlooked this fact.

Gandhi, by involving himself and the Congress in the Khilafat Movement made Pan-Islamism a respectable concept in India and revived its popularity among the Muslims in India and diverted the focus of Muslims in India from national to international issues.

The British Government at that time rightly viewed the Ali Brothers as international Islamic terrorists and jailed them. Hearing of their impending arrest, the Maha-appeaser Gandhi declared at Allahabad on May 10th 1921: “I cannot understand why the Ali Brothers are going to be arrested, as the rumour goes, and why am I to remain free. They have done nothing which I would not do. If they had sent a message to the Amir of Afghanistan, that if he came, no Indian, as long as I can help it, would help the government to drive him back.” Gandhi would commit even treasonable acts in the name of Muslim appeasement. Why did Gandhi become a Muslim appeaser? This would need a separate article.

Moulana Mohammad Ali was even made President of the Indian National Congress at the Kakinada Session in 1923. There he showed his true jihadi colours by trying to prevent the reputed singer and patriot VISHNU DIGAMBAR PALUSKAR from singing the Vande Mataram song saying that music is haraam in Islam. Vishnu Digambar Paluskar retorted: “The Indian National Congress is not the monopoly of one particular sect nor is this place a mosque, where singing could be prohibited. Moreover, if singing in this place is against your particular religion, how is it you could tolerate music in your Presidential procession? You have no authority to prevent me from singing Vande Mataram.” [from ‘Vande Mataram Album’ by V. Sundaram I.A.S, Ennapadam Educational Publishers, 2nd Ed May 2010, Pg 84.] The traitorous Mohammad Ali, “loved Muslim brother” of the Maha-appeaser Gandhi had no answer to this challenge left the dias when Paluskar went on with his rendition of this glorious song-tribute to Bharat Mata to the joyous and heart-felt applause of the audience.

After the War of 1857, the incidence of Hindu-Muslim riots in India had come down sharply. But the Muslim-appeasement by Gandhi taking the form of lending support to the Khilafat Movement of Ali Brothers in 1920, inaugurated a new era of a fresh wave of Hindu-Muslim riots. The insurgency we are facing today from the anti-National Muslims today in Kashmir, Assam, Kerala, Bengal and Tripura and the communal tensions in Tamil Nadu, Maharashtra, Uttar Pradesh and other parts of India stem from Maha-appeaser Gandhi’s unconditional support for the pan-Islamic Khilafat Movement in 1920-21.

A bright young lawyer in the Congress warned the opportunist Gandhi against mixing religion with politics. But Gandhi would care no less, after all he wanted to curry favour to the fanatical Muslims and win their approval. The bright young lawyer was thoroughly disgusted with Gandhi’s hypocrisy. He left the Congress and joined the Muslim League, negotiated on equal terms with Gandhi, caused the slaughter of several hundreds of thousands of Hindus and forced the creation of Muslim Pakistan. He was Muhammad Ali Jinnah, the political heir to the alleged “Mahatma”.

Achyut Patwardhan one of the Socialist stalwarts of the Congress, has given a brutally honest analysis of Gandhi’s Khilafat imbroglio: “Apart from the fact that Khilafat was an unworthy reactionary cause, Mahatma Gandhi had to align with a sectarian revivalist Muslim leadership of clerics and maulavis. He was thus unwittingly responsible for jettisoning sane, secular modernist, secular leadership among the Muslims of India and foisting upon the Indian Muslims a theocratic orthodoxy of the Maulavis. Maulana Mohammad Ali’s speeches appear today to be strangely incoherent and out of tune with the spirit of secular political freedom. The Congress Movement which released the forces of religious liberalism and reform among the Hindus and evoked a rational scientific outlook placed the Muslims of India under the spell of orthodoxy and religious superstition by their support to the Khilafat leadership. Rationalist leaders like Jinnah were rebuffed by this attitude of the Congress and Gandhi.”

The remarks of Sir Chettur Sankaran Nair, Member of the Viceroy Executive Council at that time, are interesting:
“It is impossible to believe that Gandhi and his adherents are not aware of this claim of the Mahomedans to be judged only by the law of the Koran, is a claim which is the fons et origo of all Khilafat claims of whatever kinds. It is as well to be clear about this, for not only the acceptance of the claim means the death knell of the British Empire or Indo-British commonwealth, whatever name he may care to give to the great fraternity of nations to which we belong, but specifically as regards India it means a real denial of Swaraj. For it involves Mahomedan rule and Hindu subjection.” [Gandhi and Anarchy, by Sir C. Sankaran Nair. Tagore & Co. Madras, 1922]

In the meanwhile the Arabs did not want their countries to remain under the control of the Turkish Sultans and Mustafa Kemal, the President of the Turkish Republic abolished the obsolete and unpopular Sultanate as well as the Caliphate. After the martyrdom of Imam Hussein, the Shias did not recognize the Khalifa and therefore did not shed a tear when Mustafa Kemal “Ataturk”, the Father of Modern Turkey, finally abolished the institution of Caliphate and deposed Sultan Abd-ul-Mejid II in 1924 and expelled the latter from Turkey with the rest of his family. Ataturk by his actions cut the ground from under the feet of the Indian champions of that pan-Islamic institution. Khilafat Movement was a mega flop insofar as the restoration of the Khalifa was concerned. Muslims were furious with Gandhi for the failure of the great expectations raised by Gandhi’s participation in the Khilafat Movement.

This treacherous ingrate Mohammad Ali, “loved Muslim brother” of the Maha-appeaser Gandhi paid this tribute in 1924: “However pure Mr Gandhi’s character may be, he must appear to me from the point of view of religion inferior to any Mussalman, even though he be without any character.” A year later when he was questioned at a public meeting in Lucknow, the shameless jihadi Muslim Mohammad Ali reiterated: “Yes, according to my religion and creed, I do hold an adulterous and a fallen Mussalman to be better than Mahatma Gandhi.”

No personal insult or abuse from the Muslims and no treasonable acts of the Muslims would deter Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi from his life mission of Muslim-appeasement.

However a frustrated Gandhi exclaimed: “EVERY MUSSALMAN IS A BULLY AND EVERY HINDU IS A COWARD.” Gandhi was transferring his own cowardice on to the Hindus. Gandhi obviously did not know or understand Hindu Kshatriya valour or the brilliant spiritual light of the Hindu Guru parampara which stubbornly resisted Muslimization of India, despite repeated military defeats large scale destruction of temples, genocides, mass slavery, depopulation of cities and held aloft the torch of Sanatana Dharma.

The thoroughly cynical and opportunist alliance between Congress under the leadership of Gandhi with the Khilafat Movement under the Ali brothers was to utilise the violence prone behaviour of Muslims to frighten the British Colonial government into leaving India. Gandhi was very aware of the violent nature simmering in the psyche of the Muslims but he was willing, out of his rancour for the British Raj, to make any, absolutely any, compromise with the Muslims at any cost, to the Hindus, ofcourse! Gandhi’s compromises and concessions to the Muslims to further his political agenda were always at a great cost to the Hindus who trusted, honoured and followed him.

According to Nirad C. Choudhury, “ … all Hindu political leaders were profoundly suspicious of Pan-Islamism and its influence on Indian Muslims…. By allying itself with the Khilafat Movement, the Congress had encouraged most retrograde form of Islamic group consciousness” [Thy Hand Great Anarch- India 1921-1952. pp 38, 39]

“Though the efforts of Khilafat leaders abroad fell like a house of cards, their fury would not abate inside Bharat. The fanatical mullahs and maulavis began to preach to the gullible Muslim masses that India is Dar-ul-Harab”. [The Tragic Story of Partition, by H.V Sheshadri, Sahitya Sindhu Prakasana, Bangalore, 1998 Ed. Pg 63].

Exactly what is this Darul Harab? Well, according to Dr. Jagan Kaul Krishan Bhatnagar, Hindu Jagran Forum (USA), Dar-ul-Harab is a charming little commandment according which, Muslims, when they are not in a hopeless minority, must conduct subversions and act against all human values to leverage their position in the polity and ultimately become rulers (so that they can impose their
misogynist, Arab Supremacist, parasitical, intolerant desert death cult
on those unfortunate enough to live in their midst).

Though the Khilafat Movement had fizzled out in most parts of India by 1921, al taqquiya (or ISLAMIC SACRED LYING) flowered amongst the Muslim Clerics of Malabar.

The Muslim clerics set afloat the propaganda among the Moplah Muslims
that the Khilafat Movement was crowned with success,
that the British regime has come to an end and
that the Khilafat has been reinstated.
Now it was the time to eliminate all kafirs (Hindus!) and establish Dar-ul-Islam,
the Moplahs were told.

The fallout was terrible and gruesome. Moplah fury was first directed against the British. But after police firing and deaths of their own men, the Muslim Moplah cowards turned their wrath against the unsuspecting, unprepared and unarmed hapless Hindus who were, in their bigoted and prejudiced Islamic eyes, as much kafirs as the British. The tragic history of the Moplah Rebellion of 1921 unfolds.

THE MOPLAH REBELLION OF 1921

The seeds of Islamic jihadi fanaticism that were sowed by the Mysorian invaders, Hyder Ali and Tippu Sultan were reaped as bumper harvest during the days of the Moplah Rebellion of 1921.

The Moplahs are a band of fanatic Muslims who have descended from the Arabs trader-pirates who settled in the Malabar Coast in about the 8th or 9th century AD and married mostly Hindu women and created a sizeable population of Muslims.

The Moplahs were illiterate and in their perception English was the language of their enemy and hence education in that language a taboo. They hated even their mother tongue, Malayalam, which they viewed the language of the hated kafir Hindus. Moplah children were admitted to madrasahs run by obscurantist mullahs. A few of them could read and write Malayalam, that also exclusively written in Arabic script only. Over the years they acquired an unenviable notoriety for crimes against non-Muslims perpetrated under the impulse of religious frenzy. They were responsible for 35 riots during the British rule, the most terrible being the one that took place in August-September 1921 known in history as ‘The Moplah Rebellion’.

During the early months of 1921, Islamic excitement spread speedily from mosque to mosque, village to village in the areas in and around Calicut. The violent speeches of the brothers, Mohammad Ali and Shaukat Ali, the early approach of Swaraj as foretold in the non-cooperating press, the July Resolutions of the Khilafat Conference all added fuel to the fire.

All through July and August 1921, Khilafat Meetings were held in which the Karachi resolution was fervently endorsed. Knives, swords etc were secretly manufactured and preparations were made to proclaim the coming of the Kingdom of Islam.

“Many Nair and Brahmin landlords fled the Malabar during Tippu’s jihad against the Hindus leaving their vast wealth behind. The Moplahs forcibly took possession of their lands and wealth. Tippu Sultan did not object to their actions. Most of the Moplah landlords of today claim that they purchased the ownership of the landed properties from Nairs and Brahmins after paying heavy compensation. These blatant lies are being repeated by them in spite of the fact that practically nothing was paid to the Hindu landlords then or later. The same Islamic treachery was repeated during the Moplah riots of 1921. When the British established their rule in Malabar and the Hindu landlords made efforts to recover their landed properties, illegally occupied by the local Moplah, Mullahs started preaching to their fanatic followers that "killing of Hindu landlords was a sacred Islamic act," leading to frequent Moplah outrages in Malabar.”

“In Cherunad, Vettathunad, Eranad, Valluvanad, Thamarassery and other interior areas, local Moplah unleashed a reign of terror on the Hindu population, mainly to retain the illegally occupied land and to establish their domination over Hindus as during Tippu's regime. Fearing the organised robberies and violence, people could not even travel freely in the Malabar hinterland of predominantly Moplah population.” [Tippu Sultan, Villain Or Hero. An Anthology. Voice Of India, New Delhi. Article titled 'Religious Intolerance Of Tippu Sultan.' By Late P.C.N. Raja]

A fanatic rabble-rousing Muslim cleric named Ali Musliar was proclaimed as Raja of Malabar. Khilafat flags were flown, Ernad and Walluvanad areas were declared as Khilafat kingdoms.

On 20 August, 1921, the District Magistrate of Calicut with the help of British troops attempted to arrest certain leaders who were in the possession of fire arms at Tirur-angaadi. A severe armed encounter took place between the police and the rioters, which was the signal for an immediate rebellion throughout the whole locality. Government properties were systematically attacked by armed mobs then looted and destroyed. The Europeans who did not succeed in escaping the mob fury were murdered. As soon as the administration was paralyzed the Moplahs declared that Khilafat had been established.

The main brunt of the Moplah ferocity was borne, not by the colonial government but by the local Hindus who constituted the majority of the population. The Moplahs found in the local Hindu aristocracy soft targets that they could plunder, slaughter and rape without fear of reprisals. Their wanton and unprovoked jihadi assaults on unarmed and unorganised Hindus resulted in deaths of thousands of Hindus and a very large number of forcible conversions.

The Moplah jihadis then indulged in whole scale plundering of artistically designed beautiful ancient Hindu homes and Hindu temples. Like frenzied animals, they murdered with wild abandon offering Islam or death. Villages after villages were converted to Islam en masse.

Descendants of the ancient Hindu civilization who would not submit to the desert death cult called Islam had to flee from their homes with nothing but their clothes they had on, stripped of everything, even their human dignity.

The cruelty, brutality and horridness of the attack were far-reaching and incomprehensible. The Muslim jihadis had given only two options to the Hindus – either convert to Islam or face death.

Accept the suffocating Peace of Islam or be carved into Pieces.

To those raped and outraged Hindu women who appealed to the Moplahs in the name of Khilafat leader Mahatma Gandhi, the barbarous Moplahs said, “Gandhi is a kafir, how can he be our leader?” So much for Gandhi’s psychotic fetish for Hindu- Muslim amity!

Gandhi refused to blame the Moplahs for the Islamic savagery that they had visited on the unarmed and unprepared Hindu population. Gandhi was so much obsessed by the necessity of establishing Hindu-Moslem unity that he was prepared to make light of the doings of the Moplas and the Khilafats who were congratulating them. He wrote in Young India of 8th September 1921: “It is clear that the Moplahs have succeeded in taking half a dozen lives and have given a few hundred.” In the same article, he praised the Moplahs for being “among the bravest in the land. They are brave God-fearing Moplas who were fighting for what they consider as religion and in a manner which they consider as religious. … Whilst I was in Calcutta, I had what seemed definitive information that there were only three cases of forced conversions ... but I do not think it seriously interferes with Hindu-Muslim Unity.” This was Gandhian double-speak at its creative best! Only three cases of forced conversions, the Maha-appeaser Gandhi claims! But still his concern was not for those converted but for his psychotic fetish for Hindu-Muslim Unity at any cost to the Hindus. Let it be known that Sir William Vincent clarified on 16 January 1922 on the floor of the Central Legislature: “The Madras Government report that the number of forcible conversions probably runs to thousands but that for obvious reasons it will never be possible to obtain anything like an accurate estimate.” So much for Truth or Satya in Gandhi’s Satyagraha!

When confronted by the ever increasing mass of evidence of Moplah conducted Genocide against Hindus of Malabar, Gandhi wrote: “Our Moplah brethren have gone mad.” “They have conducted a sin against Khilafat and against their own country.” Within a month the ever irresolute Gandhi changed tack.. “It is wrong to say that Islam employed force.” And then ignoring the thousand odd years of Islamic savagery against the Hindus of India he wrote: “No religion in this world is spread through the use of force.” “No Mussalman to my knowledge, has ever approved of compulsion.” But even this opportunist, Muslim-appeaser Gandhi in a burst of candour wrote in Young India, on 26 January 1922: The Collected Works of Mahatma Gandhi, Volume XXVI, Publication Division, Ministry of Information and Broadcating, Government of India: “New facts were made to suit the principle, instead of performing the impossible act of changing the principle”.

However, the Enquiry Committee of the Servants of India Society submitted a Report to the Government of India in 1921, detailing the actual facts, as opposed to Gandhi’s ‘suitable’ facts, on the ground. The number of Hindus murdered in Malabar District was 1,500, the number forcibly converted to Islam 20,000 and the value of property looted was more than Rs 3 crore at 1921 prices!

The Moplahs let loose an orgy of massacres, forcible conversions, looting, burning desecration and demolition of temples, foul outrages upon women etc freely against the Hindus until the British troops arrived on the scene with fire arms and orders to ‘shoot to kill’ to restore law and order. Among the rioters the number killed was 2,266, wounded 1,615, captured 5,688 and surrendered 38,656. Finally the Khilafat “King” and his merry band of rabid cut-throat rape-warriors fell to British hands.

The Muslim rioters were court-martialled and summarily hanged by the British authorities. Contrast this with the namby-pamby wishy-washy Congress, pussy-footing around the hardened psychotic Muslim criminals of the likes of Afzal Guru who had attacked the Indian Parliament along with well armed and well trained Muslim jihadis from Pakistan.

By the end of 1921 the British Colonial Government had brought under control law and order situation in Malabar.

J. Campbell, Chief of the Central Intelligence Department and even Theodore Morrison, Champion of Muslim separatism, held the Khilafat leaders squarely responsible for inciting Islamic hatred resulting in the Moplah carnage (directed against the Hindus of Malabar). Gandhi had ranked supreme among the leaders of the Khilafat Movement.

Next: A heart-rending petition to Lady Reading, the wife of Lord Reading, the then Viceroy of India from the brutalised women of Malabar led by the senior Rani of Nilambur.

Smt Sasikala Teacher's Speech

TO AWAKEN THE HINDU FROM HIS DEEP SLUMBER

Previous speech by Smt. K.P. Sasikala Teacher.

A powerful lioness from the Hindu Aikya Vedi pride, Smt Sasikala Teacher, roared tremendously from the podium on the occasion of Guruji Birth Centenary Celebrations filling the Hindus with admiration and their enemies with trepidation.

The Centenary Celebrations began on Feb 24, 2006. Hindu rallies were organised at the block level all over the country. Meetings of community and religious leaders were held with the objective of promoting social harmony. Seminars, symposia and lectures were organised to propagate the ideas and vision of Shri Guruji. The concluding ceremony of the Centenary Celebrations was organised in New Delhi on February 18, 2007.

I endeavour to present before you the kaleidoscope of rapidly moving colours shades and hues of messages and meanings that emanated from the thunderous leonine roar that reverberated on that occasion.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Distinguished guests seated on the podium, my dear fellow Hindu activists and my other sisters and brothers!

We are gathered here on the penultimate day of the Birth Centenary Celebrations, at the Taluk level, of Param Pujaneeya Guruji M.S Gowalkar the second "Sarsanghchalak of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh.

The audience and those distinguished persons seated on the stage are not unaware of the sacrifices made by Guruji and the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh for this Nation and for the Hindu society. The Birth Centenary Celebrations of Param Pujaneeya Guruji are being held at 159 Taluks.

We have come to understand this fact that when ever such large Hindu conferences take place, there are people outside the venue, who despite their hectic work schedules, cover their faces and hide their bodies but lend us their ears. These Hindus are present in spirit but not in bodies. Among those Hindus, who lend us their ears but who do not attend the conferences, there may be well-wishers and there may also be friends. There is a question that at least some of them ask us at some time or the other. The Hindus who say with pride that they are Hindus have had to face this question on several occasions. The question is none but this. “Ok, we agree when you say that the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh has been functioning since 1925; that the man who had the most tremendous impact on our era, Dr Hedgewarji, the karma yogi, Param Pujaneeya Guruji and tens of thousands of selfless activists have worked for Hindu solidarity and prosperity; that the Sangh had been active in Kerala since 1940. Now tell us what has been your achievement in Kerala ?”

This is the question for which we need to enlighten them with an appropriate answer.

They ask, have we been able to return at least one Member of Parliament or one Member of the Legislative Assembly. Many of us have had to face this question. It is the grossly distorted value system of the society is responsible for the very fact that such questions are put to us. People think that politics means only party politics and that the benchmark for success of party politics has to be measured by the “spoils of office” or the rewards and benefits considered by a winning political party to be its legitimate due. It is due to this preconceived and misconceived notion of the society that we are asked such a question. However, even those who ask us this question are aware of the reality that there have been drastic changes in the Hindu society of Kerala. They realize it even if they are unable to honestly admit it.

In 1921 when the Moplah Muslims, instigated by the “Secular” Gandhi’s Khilafat Agitation, were awash with a monster tide of murderous Islamic religious frenzy in Eranadu and Valluvanadu Taluks of the erstwhile Malabar District,
the Hindu who surrendered his neck,
the Hindu who abandoned his Dharma,
the Hindu who discarded his wealth,
the Hindu who when his temples were defiled, desecrated, despoiled and destroyed looked on passively hopelessly and helplessly,
the Hindu who turned and fled without even once looking at others around him …
all this is part of the savage history of Malabar Moplah Rebellion,
the shame filled history of Hindu humiliation and
the tragic story of the SECOND MALABAR HINDU GENOCIDE.

Fast forward to the time of Maaradu beach massacre, of poor Hindu fishermen by Islamic Pakistan-inspired and Communist-supported well-armed jihadis, which left 8 immediately dead and 15 mortally wounded. Not one single Hindu had fled the Maaradu beach in the wake of the pre-planned murderous assault.

If the Hindu had resolutely and with a stout heart held his ground then it is not because of any traditional strong will of the Hindu fishermen of Maaradu beach or their brute physical strength or any courage that the Hindu might have acquired as a matter of course but because of the disciplined Hindutva activity of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh which instilled Hindu consciousness in the Kerala Hindu Society filling it with vigour and verve and enabled those handful of poor Hindu fisher folks to face their armed assailants with courage and fortitude. There was an organized Hindu society standing solidly behind them.

In 1950 the famous Sabarimala Temple burned … we all know it was deliberately burnt, the people from Tiruvalla Town know the whole story. During the death dance of the Christian fundamentalists the sanctum sanctorum and the holy image of Lord Aiyappa got burned down. The average Hindu of those days cried in their temples and in their private pooja rooms and with voices choked with emotion tearfully implored Lord Aiyappa, “Please chop off the arms of those who vandalized your holy temple”. However, Lord Aiyappa not being into the mercenary hit man business, no hands were chopped off!

Lord Krishna had said in Bhagawat Gita, “Arjuna, take up the bow and fight, I will personally drive your chariot.” Lord Krishna did not say, “Don’t worry, just sit tight with holy marks on your foreheads and say your lovely melodious prayers in chaste Sanskrit with perfect cadence and intonation, I will do all the work for saving Dharma.” HE said, “Yield not to paltry faint-heartedness, shake off that unbecoming and unmanly despondency, take up your weapons and fight, and then and only then I will guide you to definite victory. ... You will be forced to fight whether you wish to or not. … You have no choice but to fight.”

The Hindu forgetting the teachings of Lord Krishna, beseeched Lord Aiyappa to punish those Christian fundamentalists who burnt the holy Sabarimala Temple and nothing happened at all. But as Sri Sadanandan Master said some time back, when a “cross” appeared “mysteriously” in the Nilackal mountain forest belonging to Sabarimala Temple, the Hindu devotees did not merely pray to the Lord Aiyappa to save them, instead all the Hindu devotees went in unison and acting in concert forcefully wrenched that “cross” out of the sacred ground and threw it far away. If the devout Hindus could act with courage of conviction and strength of character then it is not the strength they allegedly acquired over passage of time, rather it is because of the disciplined Hindutva activity of Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh which organized the then divided and scattered Kerala Hindu Society and instilled the sense of Hindu consciousness in them and gave them moral and physical courage to take on their implacable foes.

In Malappuram Jilla, there is no Hindu who does not know the saga of the wealthy Muslim businessman and estate owner Uneen Sahib who, out of profound reverence, sheer affection and deep devotion to the ancient rishi parampara, returned to the fold of Sanatana Dharma and proudly adopted the Hindu name Ramasimhan.

The local Muslim clergy trembled at the thought that if lay Muslims become aware of the greatness, glory and grandeur of the ancient Sanatana Dharma they will seek liberation from the tight suffocating Islamic grip and escape to the liberal, liberating and exhilarating environs of Sanatana Dharma.

Moplah Muslims armed with deadly weapons entered the house of Ramasimhan and in a dastardly act slaughtered the sleeping Ramasimhan along with his family and retainers in cold-blood. The Moplah Muslim vandals then demolished the beautiful Mattummal Sri Narasimha Moorthy Temple which was reconstructed by the intrepid Ramasimhan at the dawn of Indian independence. The terrified Hindus of the locality even feared to retrieve and give a funeral to the bodies of the slain Ramasimhan and family. We remember that Malappuram Jilla which feared a violent aftermath if they tried to retrieve the bodies of Sri Ramasimhan and his family to give them a decent funeral, remained petrified with horror.

Today we have come to know that the Hindus of that very same Malappuram Jilla have fought an arduous and protracted legal battle and retrieved the premises of the Narasimha Moorthy Temple, which was adored by the pious Ramasimhan, and the adjacent buildings and temple properties. The Malappuram Jilla is no more the place where the Hindus remained petrified with horror. Ramasimhan Trust is moving forward with reconstruction of the Mattummal Sri Narasimha Moorthy Temple and the place where that Temple once stood is now renamed Ramasimhan Nagar by the Hindus of Malappuram to keep alive the sacred memory of the Hindu martyr Ramasimhan for whom they have nothing but the deepest affection and the utmost pride. The sacred memory of Ramasimhan fills the invigorated Hindus of Malappuram Jilla with zeal and fervour. If the miniscule Hindu population of Malappuram Jilla which had once remained frozen with fear in the presence of a scene of mass murder can now outstare the adversary and move with firm steps and courageous mien it is not because that the Hindu acquired courage over a course of time but because of the disciplined Hindutva activity of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh which instilled Hindu consciousness in the Kerala Hindu Society filling it with vitality and valour.

Today the Hindu society is organized enough and united enough to face the direct challenges posed to it. But that, my sisters and brothers, is not enough. A health conscious person does not wait for a disease to strike and then achieve its cure. A health conscious person would aim at preventing a disease from attacking the body. Today we have the organized strength to face the challenges posed to our society, but that is not enough. What we need to achieve is a state of affairs wherein challenges posed to our society will be few and far. It is to this end that we must act, so time has not yet come that we can put up our feet and relax in tired indolence. We may have lots of stories of victories against anti-Hindu forces. Every village may have its tale of awakening of Hindu consciousness. Today the Hindu is not a fallen tree which any one can jump on with ease and with impunity. We must act to achieve a state of affairs wherein our enemies will think twice before posing challenges to our society. To this end we must have full awareness of the situation existing today, the challenges and pitfalls facing the Kerala Hindu society.

It is of course easy to merely describe the situation facing the Kerala Hindu of today. The Kerala Hindu has the generous liberal democratic choice of death before
the armed murderous jihadi,
the treacherous cancerous evangelical destroyers of our beloved families and
the anti-Hindu “secular” politician who will use all the provisions of our constitution, laws, government policies and government machinery to destroy us with supreme contempt and malicious neglect.

We are walking around carrying with us these ample choices to choose our demise from.
The death sentence has already been passed concerning us, Kerala Hindus.
We can be done to death violently by the savage jihadis.
We can be destroyed by the foreign inspired and sponsored “evangelical love” also known as Christian religious conversion.
We can be throttled, choked and suffocated to death by the withering contempt and cruel neglect of the politicians, whom we unfailingly and regularly vote to the halls of authority and seats of power.

It is this awareness of the THREE MORTAL ENEMIES that the Hindu society desperately needs. It is only this awareness of the three mortal enemies that can prepare the Hindu society to create a state of affairs wherein our enemies will think twice before posing challenges to our society. We must be mindful of the extent to which our Hindu society has been entrapped and ensnared by these three enemies.

Let us start with the murderous jihadi terrorists. Islamic Fundamentalism is not a problem confronting only Kerala State. It is a problem confronting the entire world. But can a problem confronting the entire world be solved by a few Hindus here? We are aware that it cannot be so. Islamic terrorism can strike any where, be it America or Britain or Russia or Indonesia. But should Islamic terrorism exist in India? That is our question.

Is the world’s largest democracy incapable of combating Islamic terrorism? Is the country with the world’s longest written constitution incapable of combating Islamic terrorism? Yes, it is definitely capable of doing just that! Then why is this country being repeatedly ravaged by the scourge of terrorism. This is the question that is vexing us, concerned citizens, today.

If this country is being repeatedly laid low by terrorism, then it is not the capability or efficiency of the terrorists. If this country is being repeatedly laid low by terrorism, then it is because the society has lost its ability to recognize identify the supporters, collaborators, facilitators and sponsors of Islamic terrorism. More dangerous than the thieves are the conspirators to thievery. This society is unable to recognize and identify those who sponsor terrorism, those who inspire terrorism, those who provide ideological foundations for terrorism, those writers, and opinion makers who, with unfailing regularity, white wash the crimes of the terrorists. This society is unable to unmask and denude in public the hollow pretentions of social uprightness of those demonical collaborators and that is why Islamic terrorism is flourishing and growing by leaps and bounds in our land. Islamic terrorism is flourishing not because those few terrorists are in any way great. Islamic terrorism is flourishing because of these treacherous and heinous apologists for Islamic terrorism.

Let us examines some instances within the limited time we have here. The State Government Order that all male employees must attend work clad in white cotton dhoties (mundu in Malayalam) was saw its ceremonial inaugural implementation in the State Capital Trivandrum. Our Honourable Chief Minister Comrade V. S Achyutanandan was scheduled to donate the first white cotton dhoti to the veteran Malayalam film actor Mr. Jagathy Sreekumar. However this aged revolutionary-lion hero Comrade V. S Achyutanandan declined to honour Jagathy Sreekumar on the grounds that the thespian was embroiled in the Vithura sex scandal involving gang rape of a minor girl. An accused in a criminal case should not be publicly feted was the stand taken by our Chief Minister. The highly literate Keralam saluted the Chief Minister’s public display of fealty to the Constitution and reverence for law and order. We experienced much pride and joy in the knowledge that we have in our state a Chief Minister who has loyalty to the Constitution and respect for law and order!

Let us consider another instance. Recently the Venerable Kanchi Acharya Sri Jayendra Saraswathi Swamigal had visited Kerala. At that time all the government functionaries had stayed away from all the functions attended by the Venerable Kanchi Acharya. The excuse dished out in the media was that the Acharya was one of the defendants in a murder case. Some history-sheeter blurted out the Acharya’s name after a round of violent “hospitality” in a Tamil Nadu Police lockup and the Venerable Acharya instantly became a defendant in a criminal case. But a criminal case was pending before the magistracy so when the government functionaries excused themselves from the Acharya’s presence the “secular” Malayalis held their heads high in their pride at the Rule of Law being given precedence over all positions spiritual and temporal.

Soon enough we had to witness a sorry spectacle. Abdul Nasser Maudani arrested on 8 April, 1998 in connection with 1998 Coimbatore bomb blast which left 56 people burnt to death was indicted under various sections of the Indian Penal Code - spreading communal hatred, criminal conspiracy, and sedition. We see these very same self-proclaimed “secularists” going on political pilgrimage to the Coimbatore Central Jail to pay homage to this mass murderer who was declared ineligible for bail by the High Courts.

Jagathy is an accused in a case, so then don’t give a dhoti in a public function, Shankaracharya is an accused so, don’t share the dais with him, but, do conduct political pilgrimages to the Coimbatore Central Jail to have a darshan of the mass-murderer Islamic terrorist who was declared ineligible for bail by the High Court. Aah! This is the anti-Hindu “secularism” for you!

We also witnessed with deep revulsion the Kerala Assembly unanimously passing an anti-national resolution on March 16, 2006 seeking the release of terrorist Abdul Nasser Maudani, on “humanitarian” grounds. Sufiya, terrorist wife of this terrorist Maudani, also wanted in another terror case has a bevy of “secular” admirers and well wishers calling on her, offering her bouquets and making kind enquiring about her health and well being. In India “secularism” is perverted.

Each gram of tallow lost by Maudani, each hair of his esteemed Islamic terrorist self that turned white in Coimbatore Jail and each inch of girth that was lost around his corpulent Islamic waist was commented upon in threadbare detail and paeans were sung in his honour by

the ever attentive minority controlled media,

the vote seeking politicians, and

the cultural leaders and social intellectuals who are paid and kept by the CPI (M).

These anti-Hindu Nehruvian “secularists ” went to Coimbatore Jail with weighing machines to measure and record the falling weight of the Islamic terrorist. None of these alleged “secularists” had any problems interacting with the Islamic terrorists who are defendants in cases involving high treason. WHY? This is the anti-Hindu “secularism” for you!

In this land, the jihadi terrorist is an honourable face. Each youth is grappling with the question – whether to live and work in honour or become a Jihadi terrorist!

In Sreekrishnapuram is a small village near Cherpulassery Town in Palakkad District of Kerala. Outside that village, in the Paalamala forest, when an Adivasi died of extreme starvation, none of the “secularists ” who stood in queues to measure the reducing waist line of the diabetic Islamic terrorist Maudani enjoying Tamil Nadu Government hospitality in Coimbatore Jail, none of the secularists who carried weighing machines to accurately record the falling weight of their beloved Islamic terrorist bothered to know the extent of poverty and deprivation faced by the Hindu Adivasis who, pushed into starvation, were disposed of their lands and livelihoods and were driven into alcoholic destitution, disease and despair.

It is these very same anti-Hindu Nehruvian “secularists” have driven this rich land and her once-proud people from plenitude to poverty.

The one-legged Islamic terrorist Madauni languishing in the Coimbatore Jail brought tears to our eyes. His loss of human rights agitated us and made us loose our sleep. In the same Coimbatore Jail, there is an accused by the name Sateesh, whose both legs are afflicted. Born in a traditional Hindu blacksmith community, he is accused of having manufactured weapons. That is the case against him. A poor man accused of making some money manufactured weapons. The Malayalee society which arranged elaborate Ayurvedic treatment for the one-legged Muslim Madauni did not bother to send even one ounce of medicine to the Sateesh who is confined to a wheel chair in the very same Coimbatore Jail. WHY? This is the anti-Hindu “secularism” for you!

Sateesh is a petty criminal, we don’t want any criminals; we want only Islamic terrorists. The market is pretty much down for petty criminals, we want only the Islamic terrorists who take human lives with out a tinge of conscience. So when we go in processions for terrorists, more and more dreaded Madaunis are created.

We know that this October was a time for humiliation for all Bharateeyas. It was on October 20th that the sanctum sanctorum of our Democracy was assaulted.

Several security guards were killed in the assault on the Indian parliament on 13 December 2001. Mohammad Afzal the sole surviving terrorist who was captured was condemned by our Supreme Court to be hanged to death on October 20.

This October 20 went by, November 20 went by. December 20 went by. January 20 went by and now February is with in reach. Can any one of you say what the condition of Mohammad Afzal is? Will Mohammad Afzal definitely be hanged or will he be consecrated either as India’s Home Minister or as Kerala’s Education Minister? We have such doubts because of our past experiences. Will we have the misfortune of seeing him in any of these positions?

Why is it that we cannot carry out a verdict of death sentence handed out by the Court? It is not the RSS, VHP or Hindu Aikya Vedi who passed death sentence on Afzal. It is the Supreme Court of India which handed out the death sentence.

On 1st December 1999 at around 10.35 AM, the class teacher of Mokeri East U.P. School in Koothuparambu near Panur in Kannur District and Vice- President of Bharatiya Janata Yuva Morcha, Kerala State, K.T. Jayakrishnan was conducting class for his 6th standard students. Suddenly, his Police bodyguard (provided by the Kerala State Government to protect his life due to threats from Communist criminals) disappeared and seven CPM activists entered the class room, shouted slogans and warned the students not to move, blocked the class room's entrance, took sword-sticks and razors in their hands, came near Jayakrishnan Master and stabbed him several times. Jayakrishnan Master breathed his last within five minutes.

After confirming his death, the CPM men left the place in procession, walking along the public road brandishing the blood-stained weapons as if they were celebrating a victory. This most horrible murder was committed in front of students less than 11 years old. The young children of tender age were shocked as their most respected class teacher was brutally murdered in front of them. The incident created psychological problems for many children who had to undergo psychiatric counselling.

It is the Supreme Court through whose fingers, through whose elaborate procedures of law the cruel savage animals who hacked to pieces a school teacher in front of his terrified screaming primary school students, slipped through. It is the Supreme Court that passed death sentence on Mohammad Afzal. If the verdict of the Supreme Court can be accepted in one case, it should be accepted in the other case too. The Supreme Court cannot be the Court of Justice in one case and the Court of Injustice in the other case. If the verdict of the Supreme Court can be accepted in one case, why is it that we are in a position that we cannot accept the other case. Reason is the same, an inverted and perverted anti-Hindu “secularism”.

When Mohammad Afzal was sentenced to death by hanging one Chief Minister of a State leaped up and vehemently asserted that Mohammad Afzal must not be hanged. He is none other than Ghulam Nabi Azad of the State of Jammu and Kashmir. This worthy believes that he became the Chief Minister of Jammu and Kashmir State because he is a Muslim. Of course that belief is not without an element of truth in it. This is our perverted anti-Hindu “secularism”. One cannot become the Chief Minister of Jammu and Kashmir State unless one is a Muslim. One cannot become Chief Minister of Mizoram unless one is a Christian. One cannot become Chief Minister of Nagaland unless one is a Christian.

Why go so far? Let’s talk about Kerala. In a panchayat with a Hindu minority population if it is not reserved for Schedule Castes or Schedule tribes can a Hindu possibly become the Panchayat President? So when the Hindus become minority then they can forget all posts. However in this Kerala with 56 percent Hindu majority any one can become the Chief Minister. Ooman Chandy, A.K Anthony, C.H Mohammad Koya or any one else can become the Chief Minister; that is our anti-Hindu “secularism”.

In Andhra Pradesh where there is a much greater Hindu majority, Samuel Rajasekhara, a Christian, can become the Chief Minister. In Maharashtra where there is an even greater Hindu majority, Abdul Rehman Antulay, a Muslim, can become the Chief Minister. In Bihar any one can get to be the Chief Minister since there too the Hindu is in majority. Where there is a Hindu majority, then any thing goes. But if the Hindu turns minority then the majority community gets to corner all the benefits.

Just imagine, for the post of Vice-Chancellor for the Calicut University, they couldn’t find someone from all over this Malayalee land, instead they had to go all the way to Uttar Pradesh based Aligarh Muslim University to find a Begum for adorning the post of Vice-Chancellor. REASON: the University of Calicut lies in the Muslim-majority Malappuram-Calicut Districts. Oh! How can they possibly appoint any one other than a Muslim for University of Calicut that lies in Muslim-majority Malappuram-Calicut Districts!!! Otherwise where is “secularism”, eh? This is how the anti-Hindu Nehruvian “secularism” works.

It is this perverted secularism which made Ghulam Nabi Azad Chief Minister of Jammu and Kashmir State think that he is Mussalman as is Muhammad Afzal and one Mussalman must save the life of another Mussalman, so don’t hang Afzal. Besides doesn’t Quran state that a Muslim cannot be executed for the crime of killing a non-Muslim?

I am not sure whether our Government is run according to the Constitution of India or whether it is run according to the Quran or the Shariat or some thing else. However Ghulam Nabi Azad says Afzal should not be hanged. I was under the impression that Ghulam Nabi Azad is a Congress Chief Minister. If so is this the opinion of the Congress Party? We want to know if this is the considered opinion of this Ruling Party.

We must find out whether this is the opinion of the Congress Party. We all know about this Congress Party. It is a party which many of us believe in. We all know that such a disciplined political party does not exist in this vast wide world!!! If one Congress man declares that the Sun rises in the East, then even before he puts his tongue back in his mouth, ten Congressmen would hold press conferences to proclaim that the Sun rises in the West! Such is the extent of their party discipline!!! However Ghulam Nabi Azad’s 'One Mussalman must save another Mussalman 'thesis has not been contradicted to this date by any Congressman. So if we take it that his opinion is the same as that of the Congress Party, then we see a repetition of History.

In 1931, Sukhdev Thapar, Bhagat Singh and Shivaram Rajguru the pre-eminent freedom fighters and patriots were sentenced to death by the British Colonial Government for attacking and killing a police officer after Lala Lajpat Rai was beaten to death with lathis by the British Indian Colonial Police. The “Mahatmaji” was proceeding to London for the Second Round Table Conference as the representative of the Congress Party. People in their vast numbers begged “Mahatmaji” with tears in their eyes to please ensure the death sentences of those patriotic young ones are rescinded. It was definitely within the power of that “Mahatmaji” to ensure some thing like that. But the“ secular ”“ Mahatmaji” said in no uncertain terms, we are advocates of non-violence. What Sukhdev, Bhagat Singh and Rajguru had committed, though barely out of their teens, was an act of atrocity. The perpetrators of atrocity must face the consequences of their atrocities, so exclaimed the self-righteous Congress Party!

As a consequence of the irrepressible attachment and insatiable lust for non-violence, the Congress Party decided that Veer Bhagat Singh and his comrades-in-arms should die for their acts of violence and that the Congress Party will not be defended them despite their being freedom-fighters. However you must also visualise another scene.

16 November 1926, the sanyasi who captured the imagination of the nation, the spiritual leader of Arya Samaj, Swami Shraddhananda, who was on his sick-bed, was attacked by a Muslim terrorist by the name Muhammad Rashid. In this Bharat, where a sanyasi is revered like God, an old ailing sanyasi was shot in his sick-bed by a Muslim terrorist Muhammad Rashid. This Muhammad Rashid too was awarded death sentence by the even-handed British Colonial Government.

The “secular” “Mahatmaji” and the Congress who decided out of their undying romance for non-violence to let the young Hindu heroes Sukhdev, Bhagat Singh and Rajguru be hanged by the Colonial Judicial System, that very same “secular” “Mahatmaji” rushed to meet the Viceroy and humbly pleaded that (the Muslim terrorist) Muhammad Rashid be viewed as a “misguided youth” who had committed an “unintended homicide” of the Sanyasi and importuned the Viceroy, on bent knees, to pardon “brother” Muhammad Rashid!!! This is the anti-Hindu “secularism” for you!

This story which refuses to remain erased despite several attempts to erase it and white wash it from the annals of Indian History tells us that History is repeating itself.

The “Mahatma” and the Congress Party valued the life of Muhammad Rashid in 1926 because he is a Muslim terrorist. Today in 2009 the Congress Party values the life of Muhammad Afzal only because he is a Muslim terrorist.

It is this terrorist-desiring, terrorist-coveting and terrorist-appeasing attitude that is the sole cause of the rise of Islamic terrorism. I have given this example to highlight the fact that Islamic terrorism is flourishing because of these treacherous collaborators.

Again the Leftists of Kerala and the so-called intellectuals who are compelled to set to tunes the hackneyed songs of the Leftists, come out with this time worn cliché, “Death sentence is outmoded and inhumane.” “Do we have the right to render capital punishment?”
Who are asking these questions?
Those Commies who adore the blood stains of mass slaughter by the minions of Mao and Stalin,
those who hacked to pieces the school teacher, K.T Jayakrishnan in front of his terrified screaming primary school students,
those who have a track record of attacking and stabbing to death in broad day light the individuals who leave their party,
those very people are now asking, “Do we have the right to kill?” “Isn’t death sentence is outmoded and inhumane?”
We have heard that Satan can quote the Bible, but now we are actually seeing it happen. We have now seen the form of the Satan. Since when has death sentence become inhumane in this country?

Was it not in this country that the two Hindu youth Nathuram Vinayak Godse and Narayan Apte were hanged 15 November, 1949 for killing Mahatma Gandhi? No one argued then that death sentence is inhumane. No Hindu came forward to defend these two Hindu youth. People thought that the two committed an unpardonable crime so let them pay for their crimes. No one came forward to defend these two Hindu youth.

Was it not in this country that two Sikh young men were hanged for the assassination of Indira Gandhi?
If the assassins of Indira Gandhi can be hanged, if the killers of Mahatma Gandhi can be hanged, then the attackers of the Indian Parliament … the Indian Parliament which ranks much higher than any “Gandhi” … the attackers of the Indian Parliament can also be hanged.

On the contrary, if the argument is that the assassins of Mahatma Gandhi can be hanged because they are Hindus, the assassins of Indira Gandhi can be hanged because they are Sikh, but the attackers of the Indian Parliament must not be hanged because they are Muslims then there is some thing very seriously wrong with this alleged “secularism”.

If we are living with the worry that there is no Unified Civil Code then please understand that the Unified Criminal Code is also disappearing before our eyes. If criminals are convicted after paying heed to their religion, they why is the Preamble to the Indian Constitution so hypocritically proclaiming itself to be “SECULAR”?

Article 15(1) of the Indian Constitution provides: "The State shall not discriminate against any citizen on grounds only of religion, race, caste, sex, place of birth or any of them"

Yet, discrimination is being made "on grounds of religion". In one of his statements, the anti-Hindu “secular” Prime Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh said: "Muslims have the first right to nation's resources." How is this assertion not discriminatory against other citizens "on grounds only of religion"? Our politicians are promoting their narrow political and electoral interests at the cost of those of the nation in the name of this anti-Hindu “secularism”.

Is it “secularism” to convict some one solely on the basis of his religion? We need to find an answer to this question. If it “secularism ”to convict some one on the basis of his religion then my dear people, you will need to inquire from the thief who makes a mid-night raid in your house, before you complain hand him over to the Police. Since criminals are indicted or set scot free on the basis of their religion, there may be no point in handing over criminals of certain religions, to the Police. If they are not to be convicted then at least we can save ourselves the trouble of handing over, the criminals of certain religions, to the Police. Whither is our “secularism” headed? It is the direction that our anti-Hindu “secularism” takes that creates terrorists. It is that direction that prevents our government from taking strong action against the terrorists to save our citizens. That is why Islamic terrorism is flourishing and growing by leaps and bounds in our land creating a “soft state”.

The ruling authorities are taking eunuch-like decisions and not decisive and manly steps to control the law and order situation in this country. Only decisive and manly steps will ensure that terrorism is destroyed forever. Let one bomb burst any where and our ruling authorities will be startled out of their deep slumber. They will then go back to sleep until the terrorist bombs burst! Once awaken from their deep sleep by a terrorist bomb-burst they go into a frenzy of sound and light, just like Diwali flower-pots, all sound and fury for a while. When bombs went off in Bombay suburban train station and assault rifle bullets rained all over the place, Manmohan Singh leaped out of his sleep and thundered: “There will be no compromise with terrorists.” “We will never surrender to terrorists.” “We will chop off the nose of the terrorists and pickle it.” Such furious sound bytes convinced us that it was the end of terrorism as we know it. But what happens when the chemical in the Diwali flower-pot is exhausted. No light no sound, just a little smoke for a short while and after that even that smoke is gone.

There must be another terrorist bomb blast some where else for the ruling dispensation to wake from its deep slumber. When the ruling authorities are in deep sleep, the police authorities will be drawing cartoons for their own amusement. They are drawing the sketches of criminal offenders. A bomb exploded in Kannur Bus Stand and the police started drawing sketches of the criminal offenders. A bomb exploded in Bombay suburban train station and the police started drawing sketches. A boat got burnt in Beypore and the police started drawing sketches. A K.S.R.T.C bus was burnt in Tamil Nadu and the police started drawing sketches. Let any terror incident take place and then the police will take out the canvas. Then the public is harassed with questions like, have you seen a person with this ear, have you seen a person with this nose, have you seen a person with this mouth!

People wonder why should they co-operate with the police, what is the purpose of catching the criminals and handing over them to the police? Is it to waste our tax-payers money for providing elaborate Ayurveda cures for the terrorists? Is it to waste our tax-payers money for treating the terrorists to five-star facilities? Let our tax moneys remain in the Treasury. If the terrorists remain outside then at least we can manhandle them if need be. If they are handed over to the police then for all we know, the terrorist will become a media-celebrity and a “respected leader” tomorrow. Is this how the terrorists should be dealt with? It is not the fault of the police. Earlier they looked for intelligence and physical fitness for recruitment into the police force. Nowadays it is the ability to draw sketches that is the criterion for police recruitment. They say that the ruling authorities have enough sketches to make a drawing exhibition. Whither is this country headed?

If the ruling dispensation is not compelled to take firm and decisive steps by the organized strength of the people then this country is fraught with grave danger. If the Hindu blood spilled on the streets of Eranadu and Valluavanadu for the Khalifa of some far away Turkey is still in your memory, then be aware and conscious of the crocodile tears being shed in the name of some Saddam Hussein. Otherwise time will compel us to pay for that too. The time constraint prevents me form going into that story.

There are three villains of the piece. One is the Islamic terrorist. People of Tiruvalla town are not at all unfamiliar with that category. Perhaps more than we here, the people of Tiruvalla are familiar with this category, seeing for themselves and experiencing every day. There is an overall 2.5 percent of Christian population in India today. Their continued existence as Christians or their following Christian modes of worship is not opposed by any Hindu. No Hindu is opposed to the Christians offering their kind of worship. We respect Christ and love the Christian people. The Hindu loves very much the Christ who preached that one must love the neighbour as one loves oneself. However we cannot tolerate the Christian Evangelist who insists on dragging others into his religion. We love the Christian who loves his neighbour. If the Kingdom of God belongs to him, then so be it. Let the Christian have that Kingdom of God. We have no use for it. Let the Christian have that Kingdom of Heaven too. Now when we say, we don’t want that Kingdom of God, why don’t you leave us alone? We don’t need your company. We can go alone. But now I have this doubt. They are afraid of going alone to their Kingdom of Heaven. They scream this bus will go to Kingdom of Heaven, this is not a limited stop bus; this is a non-stop bus, come on! Get in! Get in! I am inclined to believe that they are afraid of going to the Kingdom of Heaven alone. Where is the Heaven with out the Hindu? Where is the “secularism” without the Hindu? That is probably why they are throwing nets to ensnare the Hindu. We have been telling the ruling dispensation with ache in our hearts, stop religious conversions using the law of the land. Religion is not a matter of Commerce. We see unemployed youth carrying large bags of goods and telling us how profitable it is to buy those goods from them. Religion is not some thing to be sold on the streets. Religion is some thing to be experienced and realised. Bharatam is the cradle of religions, Sanatana Dharma is the Mother of all Religions. How long should we tolerate some one coming with a large bag and trying to sell us religion? Some trader come and tells us, this religion will take us straight to heaven, this has so many benefits. Religion is not some saleable commodity. It is well past the time to make religion-mongers understand that religion is not meant for sale. We are telling the ruling dispensation to bring about laws to curb religious conversions.

There should be a law against religious conversions. If the Government does not bring about a law against religious conversions, then we, the public, can stop religious conversions. The mothers seated before me can stop religious conversions. We have the strength and capability within us to do so. During the time of Rama-Avataara, the Gods and rishis were asked to take birth as Vaanars. Do you know the peculiarity of the Vaanars? They react in the same way as you behave with them. If you jump they jump. If you throw stones then they throw stones. Let’s behave like the Vaanars of the Sri Ram Sena. Let’s behave in the same manner in which they behave with us. Let’s pay them back in the same coin. Let’s go street by street and try to propagate our religion. Let us go into the houses and fix a few deals for conversion. Soon enough you will find a clamour for a law prohibiting religious conversions. Let the Hindu convert ten others to Hinduism and you will see the government bringing out a law against religious conversions.

It is not easy converting others as it is easy to convert the Hindus.
First the Government told the Hindus, have only two children and the Hindus obeyed and adopted family planning.
Then the Government told the Hindus, have only one child and the Hindus readily accepted this norm too.
Next the Government will inform the Hindus not to reproduce. Don’t have any children. You need not propagate your society. You need not exist any more.
Oh! We would agree to that too!
For us the demography is not a big deal. So when we lose numbers, no one takes notice.
But the Christians and Muslims have made their numbers through hard work. So when they lose a few numbers there will automatically come up a law against religious conversions. The ruling dispensation should ponder over the question as to whether they ought to push us into taking such a step.

In my childhood days, I have heard, the Christian Priests coming to temple festivals, standing upon a bench and yelling, “Repent! Oh Sinners!” Of course, we didn’t pay attention, as we are not sinners! So we took no heed.

In Tirupathy-Tirumala temple, the richest temple in the world, among the pilgrims standing in queues to have a darshan of the Lord, among the devotees waiting patiently for their turn a woman was apprehended for distributing pamphlets containing Christian literature. The woman was an employee of the Tirupathy-Tirumala Devasthanam! A Christian evangelist enjoying salary and perquisites from the Tirupathy-Tirumala Devasthanam and doing proselytization among the devotees on the holy Tirumala! Can the Missionaries ask for a better deal? Giving No Objection Certificates to Heaven to the Hindu devotees queued up for having a darshan of the Lord. The woman who was eating the food out of the salary given by the Lord of Tirupathy-Tirumala was doing proselytization among HIS own devotees on the holy Tirumala. How could she do it? How did this happen? This is what the present day Kerala Hindus need to inquire. This is what the present day Kerala Hindus need to inquire. This can be attributed only to the smartness and skill of the Andhra Chief Minister Samuel Rajasekhara Reddy, a Seventh Day Adventist Christian! That smartness and skill Kerala will witness tomorrow. The ruling dispensation grabbed the control and wealth of Hindu temples by sheer force and bullying.

How many of us know this shocking fact that over 60 percent of the employees of the Tirupathy-Tirumala Devasthanam are Christians? That is the smartness and skill of Samuel Rajasekhara Reddy.

When the destitute Hindu runs from pillar to post in despair, those employed in Hindu temples, those who are paid from the coins contributed by the poor Hindus, of these 60 percent are Christians. Should not this chilling fact open the eyes of the Hindus? Kerala will experience the same fate tomorrow. Kerala will experience the same fate tomorrow. Kerala temples will employ Christians while the poor Hindus suffer unemployment, starvation and malnutrition.

According to the Devaswom Bill which will become the law of the land tomorrow all employees of the Devaswom Boards in Kerala will be appointed through the Kerala Public Service Commission (KPSC). Can any reasonable person believe that only Hindus will be appointed to Hindu Temples by the KPSC? Can any reasonable person expect that KPSC will order that only Hindus apply for the posts advertised? If the KPSC issues such an order won’t it be dragged to the Courts? Will such an order limiting KPSC appointments to Hindus stand the test of "secularism"? Thus even the doors of Devaswom Boards in Kerala will be closed to Hindus. Youth of Kerala who are awaiting the news of a job appointment with bated breaths pay heed, the doors of Devaswom Boards in Kerala will be closed to you. Guardians of the unemployed youth, who go to temples after temples and pray with tears in their eyes for an employment for their wards, don’t you now think that this problem begs a solution? Don’t you now think that we need to fix this problem ourselves? According to the new Ordinance on Devaswoms all appointments will be handled by KPSC.

There may be corruption in the existing Devaswoms. We all are very aware that no organization is free from corruption. To remove corruption the society has to change. The answer to corruption is not forcible assumption of governmental control. For if that were so, then the ruling dispensation in this Kerala State which is soaked to the gills in the Lavlin corruption scandal ought to be dismissed and President’s Rule ought to be imposed on the state. If the answer to corruption is not forcible assumption of governmental control then the solution of government ministerial corruption is dismissal of the corrupt government ministry and forcible imposition of Presidential Rule. Why isn’t that being done?

Is cutting off the head, the cure for headache? Those who prescribed such a cure are suffering from lunacy and we the common people must cure those from such lunacy. If we the Hindu population do not acquire organized strength to cure those suffering the delusional lunacy of prescribing beheading as a panacea for headache, then we will see our Hindu temples that we have built up through long hard work, being emptied of their coffers and their landed wealth. We will have to witness the temple traditions destroyed. Earlier we saw our temple wealth being looted. While the temples had Crores of Rupees in earnings the Hindu remained poor. While the temples like Sabarimala, Guruvayoor, Kadampuzha and Vaikkom had Crores of Rupees in revenue, the evangelists go hunting for the poor Hindus to give them charity and hang crosses on their necks. This is because the Crores of Rupees of temple revenue went straight to the government coffers leaving nothing for the Hindu poor. The government does not want to control the places of worship of the non-Hindus. The government does not want to take the revenues from the places of worship of the non-Hindus.

The pilgrims to the famed Sabarimala Aiyappa temple go past the Vavar Mosque. None of the pilgrims had any objections to that. Vavar or Babur makes no difference to them. However, the moneys given by the Aiyappa pilgrims to the Vavar Mosque are controlled by the Erumeli Mahallu Committee. The State Government does not want to control it, or spend it or even know about it. However, the money, given by the very same Aiyappa pilgrims to the Sabarimala Aiyappa temple, goes to the Kerala State Government and is controlled by it. So the donations to the Vavar Mosque go to Islam and the donations to the Sabarimala Aiyappa temple go to the "secular" State government. This, my dear people is the wretched anti-Hindu Nehruvian SECULARISM. Please understand this is the real face of “secularism” in India.

Our Hindu temple wealth does not benefit us, Hindus. Tomorrow, even the cultural and traditional matters associated with Hindu Temples will be determined by the secular politicians. Secularism-addicted politicians and administrators who do not hesitate to take any anti-Hindu action spread the canard that if one temple is destroyed then that much superstition will be destroyed. If they take control of administrative, cultural and traditional matters associated with Hindu Temples then is there any guarantee that they will not take the decision that the Muslim Muezzin can call the “Faithful” Muslims to prayer from the ramparts of the Hindu Temples. Our experience in this matter has been so painful indeed.

If the secular politicians controlling the Temple Devaswom Boards take the decision that the Muslim Muezzin can howl five times a day to the “Faithful” Muslims to prayer from the ramparts of the Hindu Temples would the Hindu be organized enough to resist and put down such attempts. The Hindu having lost the temple wealth to the "secular" politicians controlling the Temple Devaswom Boards, can protest only from outside. So what, the "secularists", say, aren’t the Hindus meant to tolerate every thing? So, let the Muslim Muezzin give his call to Muslims to prayer from inside the Hindu temples.

Samuel Rajashekhara the earlier Chief Minister of Andhra Pradesh tried to hand over 5 out of 7 hills to the Christian evangelists and only the alert and active Hindus of that State prevented that diabolical design.

What prevents the “secular” anti-Hindu politicians from deciding that the Hindus have too many temples, so let some temples be converted to mosques? If you think this is far too outlandish then all you have to do is to refer the book ‘HINDU MASJIDS’ by Prafull Goradia.

If the secular politicians take such a subversive decision, would the Hindu be able to fight of such a challenge? We, Hindus, must be able to recapture our lost temple wealth and prevent any more of our temple wealth from being captured by others.

We study in our schools about the Travancore Kingdom being absorbed into Unified Kerala. If we dwell deep into the laws of the land we can argue that the ruling dispensation cannot assert any rights to Travancore territory let alone Hindu temples. We all know that that donated property cannot be repossessed, reclaim, reacquire or regain by the donor. Even if it is the father who has gifted his property to his son, the father cannot rescind the gift deed and retake the gifted property. Travancore Kingdom was gifted by Maharaja Marthanda Varma to Sree Anantha Padmanaabha Swami, the presiding deity of Sree Anantha Padmanaabha Swami Temple at Trivandrum. The Kings of Travancore thereafter ruled as “Padmanabha-Dasas” or Servants of Sree Anantha Padmanabha Swami. So legally this lands comprising of Travancore still belongs to Sree Anantha Padmanabha Swami.

If Colonel Munroe could grab temple properties with a drop of ink from his pen, today the glib tongued Devaswom Minister of Kerala State will not hesitate to capture Hindu temples or to illegally arrest and detain Hindus. Here is where we Hindus need to wake from our deep slumber. Temple revenues must be put to use for furthering the interests of the Hindus. Temple revenues are not to be deployed at the discretion of any secular government.

This Kerala State is a land which gives a subsidy of Rs 13,000 for each Hajj pilgrim to Makkah. That is right! This State gives a subsidy of Rs 13,000 for each Hajj pilgrim after unconstitutionally grabbing the revenues of Hindu temples. Not only they don’t give any thing to the Hindu temples, but on the contrary, they are grabbing the temple funds given by the Hindu devotees. Do the poor pilgrims to the Sabarimala Aiyappa temple get any free amenities at all? From the time a pilgrim leaves his house on his journey to the Sabarimala Aiyappa temple, he is exploited and sucked dry like sugarcane bagasse. The pilgrim has to pay toll whether there is a bridge on the road or not. The authorities try to empty his pocket in every possible way. The Main Central Road (MC Road) which is most used by the pilgrims to the Aiyappa pilgrims is dug up most of the way, but did any one care? After the Mandalam temple season and Makara Vilakku temple season, our Transport Minister proclaims loudly that he will repair the MC Road within 10 days. Now where was this Transport Minister before the two temple seasons? After the Aiyappa pilgrims travelling on the MC Road reached their respective homes with their lungs full of dust, our Transport Minister makes his grand proclamation that he will get the MC Road repaired within 10 days. Whether he will actually get the MC Road repaired or not is another matter. But why didn’t that Minister think of repairing the MC Road before the start of the two Sabarimala Aiyappa temple seasons? Aren’t these Sabarimala Aiyappa pilgrims contributing Crores of Rupees directly and indirectly to the State Government Treasury?

So if we Hindu again display apathy, demoralization and disorganization then we will be unworthy of even calling ourselves Hindus. The anti-Hindu “secular” politicians have publicly proclaimed that the Muslims have the first claim on the national resources of India. Prime Minister Manmohan Singh declared in a conference of Chief Ministers that the Muslims have the first claim on the resources and development of the Indian nation. I ask you if the Hindus are supposed to eat leftovers of other’s meal. We should be capable of asking loudly, IF THE MUSLIMS HAVE THE FIRST CLAIM ON THE NATIONAL RESOURCES OF INDIA THEN ARE THE HINDUS SUPPOSED TO EAT THEIR LEFT OVERS?

Should we allow the anti-Hindu “secular” politicians who wish to serve us leftovers from Muslims’ meals to control our Hindu temples?

Should we allow the anti-Hindu “secular” politicians who did not react, when those who came to Guruvayoor Temple to pray were forcibly taken away for conversion to Christianity, to control our Hindu temples?

When our Hindu temples lay in ruins, when our Hindu temples became dilapidated, we did not see any of these anti-Hindu “secular” politicians coming to our aid. We had struggled long and hard to restore our Hindu temples. Those anti-Hindu “secular” politicians who did not bother to help in restoring and renovating our Hindu temples, what right have they to control our Hindu temples?

The communists who proclaim that they have no God and no religion, what business have they inside our temples? Aren’t Hindu temples to be administered by devote and believing Hindus?

Kerala State Cabinet Minister, Kodiyeri Balakrishnan, went to Kadampuzha Temple, and performed certain religious ceremonies. People, please note, this shameless spineless character who is presently the Home and Tourism Minister of Kerala and a Member of Politburo of the god-less atheist Communist Party of India (Marxist) went to that temple in the cover of darkness and in the name of “Balakrishnan” despite being always known by this full name, “Kodiyeri Balakrishnan”, performed the religious ceremonies. THOSE WHO HAVE INFERIORITY COMPLEX, THOSE WHO FIGHT SHY OF PROCLAIMING THEIR HINDU FAITH, THOSE WHO DENIGRATE SANATANA DHARMA BY THE DAY AND SNEAK INTO HINDU TEMPLES FOR PRAYER UNDER THE COVER OF DARKNESS, CAN WE ALLOW SUCH WRETCHED LOW LIVES TO ADMINISTER OUR TEMPLES?

We need to think. Aren’t the Hindus the only ones with this problem? Kodieri Balakrishnan denies having gone to temple. Suddenly another “Balakrishnan” surfaces to accept the “guilt” of having gone to a Hindu temple. State Crime Branch launches an investigation. A big drama is enacted to convince the CPM cadres that their leader did not go to any Hindu temple.

Our Stalinist Kerala Chief Minister Comrade V.S Achyutanandan’s son went to Sabarimala Aiyappa Swamy temple at the dead of the night with a cloth on his head and face to avoid being recognized by the Communist Party cadre, but he was soon spotted and soon enough a political storm was kicked up!

Ex-Chief Minister Comrade Nayanar and his wife fled to Kanyakumari in the neighbouring state of Tamil Nadu to make rice ball offerings to their departed ancestors, to avoid the Communist Party cadres from coming to know of the Hindu religious ceremony conducted by their “godless atheist” leader. If the communist party cadres come to know of the incident, then it would be a “loss of face” for Comrade Nayanar and consequent eternal shame!

I ask you, if it is a matter of deep shame for the godless atheist communist E.K Nayanar and his wife to make rice ball offerings according to Hindu ritual traditions, if it is a matter of shame for the godless atheist communist Kodiyeri Balakrishnan, to be seen performing Hindu religious ceremonies in Kadampuzha temple and if it is a matter of shame for the godless atheist communist V.S Achyutanandan’s son to go on a pilgrimage to Sabarimala Aiyappa Swamy temple, then isn’t it also a matter of shame for those godless atheist communists to administer Hindu temples?

Shouldn’t it be a matter of shame for the godless atheist communists to administer the temples inhabited by the Hindu Gods and Goddesses? The Hindu must be able to loudly ask this question to the communists and demand a reply?

Comrade T.K Hamsa proudly proclaimed that as a believing and practicing Muslim he has conducted 4 Umras and a Hajj. He did not conduct 4 Umras and a Hajj with a cloth on his head to cover his face and hide his identity. On the contrary, he loudly trumpeted his Islamic faith and performed those pilgrimages with aplomb, his head held high. As long as the Hindu politicians have no strength of character and courage of conviction to assert their Hindu identity and proclaim their Hindu faith, can we allow them to enter our Hindu temples let alone administer them?

Know this, Hindu temples are meant for only for Hindu devotees. It is not for those who have no faith in Hinduism. When those who have no faith in Hinduism try to grab control of Hindu temples, then we must resist strongly and forcefully.

Hindu society’s unity is not something to be destroyed by temporary personal animosity and vendetta. We the Hindu people need to develop the inner strength to inspire our leaders. No leader of any population descends from the sky on a rope. Rather, they are drawn from the very same population. If the support of the supporters propels the leaders to greater heights of leadership, then the very same supporters too need to develop the inner strength to inspire, caution and even correct the course taken by those leaders. Hindu society should not lose its morale when faced by temporary personal animosity and vendetta. The Hindu society has studied in history classes about the personal animosity and vendetta of the Kings Jaichand and Prithviraj Chauhan around Delhi area and how it led this country to a thousand years of Islamic plunder, pillage, loot, rape, enslavement of the people, mass slaughter, mass religious conversions, destruction of temples, destruction of libraries, stoppage of scientific progress and the near collapse of Hindu civilization itself. We need to be on guard here. DO NOT LET OUR HINDU TEMPLES PASS INTO ALIEN CONTROL. DON’T LET THE ANTI-HINDU “SECULAR” POLITICIANS GRAB CONTROL OF OUR TEMPLES THROUGH THE MEDIUM OF DEVASWOM BOARDS. Until the last drop of their blood is drained away the devout Hindu population should resist this asuric manoeuvre to grab control of our Hindu temples.

Just as some Visha-Vaidyas summon the snake which bit a human and get it to remove the poison, the Hindu devotees must not give up their strenuous opposition until they compel backers and movers of the Devaswom Ordinance, to withdraw that Ordinance. Those backers and movers had chased the State Governor to procure his assent for the Devaswom Ordinance, which was hurriedly drafted in the late hours of the night.

The powerful unified presence of the Hindu devotees who compelled missionaries from exploiting the Nilackal issue to their advantage, the powerful unified presence of the Hindu devotees who similarly fought and resolved to their satisfaction the cross issue in Kanyakumari, the powerful unified presence of the Hindu devotees who forced their way into Ayodhya to achieve their religious goals; time has come to bring out once again that very same powerful unified presence of the Hindu devotees. For this the Hindu society should fortify itself with physical strength and moral courage and face their enemies who are trying to grab control of more temples with that Devaswom Ordinance. We cannot come out of the battlefield with out complete victory else we will have to face the Divine wrath. Bhaktas are the ones who are supposed to fight on the side of Easwara-Chaitanyam.

We must see in the eye of our mind the enchanting scene of the newborn babe Sri Krishna being carried in a basket by his father Prince Vasudeva to the safety of Gokulam across the flooded River Yamuna. The Lord did not just fly away to safety, he expected Prince Vasudeva to carry Him away to safety and that is just what the Prince did. You can see from this incident that we are supposed to protect Easwara-Chaitanyam with our lives, if need be.

Sri Rama, an avataar of MahaVishnu could have easily gone to Lanka with the help of Pawan-putra Hanuman, challenged King Ravana to a duel and killed him and rescued Sita Devi. Yet Sri Rama mobilised the Jambavan clan and the entire Vanara tribal nation to fight Ravana's hordes. HE also made the rishi-Munis too contribute their spiritual prowess for the victory of the vast Vanara Army of Sri Rama. Maharshi Agastya composed the Aditya Hridayam Stotram for Sri Rama’s victory. Sri Rama even made all the Gods contribute weapons to HIS army.

Why did Sri Krishna, again, an avataar of MahaVishnu demand that Arjuna get off his posterior, shake off his despondency and fight in the MahaBharata war when Sri Krishna who killed King Shishupala with a throw of Sudarshana Chakra could have easily killed Duryodhana, the Crown Prince, with a throw of Sudarshana Chakra and rendered the terrible Mahabharata war unnecessary? We are supposed to fight on the side of Dharma with all the resources at our disposal. This human intervention on the side of Dharma is a way for the Divinity to judge us mortals.

The anti-Hindu “secular” attempt to grab control of the administration of the Hindu temples and to gain control of the revenues of the Hindu temples is only to make the Hindus impoverished so that their conversions to the Semitic desert cults become easier. The anti-Hindu “secular” politicians, who are in the pay of the American-backed Christian missionaries with seemingly limitless funding, are in the forefront of the concerted attempt to grab control of Hindu temples in Kerala. The anti-Hindu “secular” politicians are only serving their Missionary paymasters and trying to facilitate conversion of Hindus. We Hindus have to wake up from our deep slumber. We are our own leaders. We have to make our own destiny. We cannot rest until this exploitive and oppressive anti-Hindu Devaswom Ordinance is withdrawn.

The mothers in these places have started displaying their courage. I came here from CherukolPuzha (near Kozhencherry Town, Pathanamthitta District). Due to constraint for time I could not talk individually to the mothers there, but as I was leaving the meeting venue group of mothers rushed to my car and told me, that the mothers there will not withdraw from their strike. They even informed me that I can proclaim where ever I go that the mothers in CherukolPuzha are not withdrawing from their strike until the anti-Hindu Devaswom Ordinance is withdrawn. They don’t know about the men folk, but the mothers are not withdrawing from their strike until they attain victory. There are so many similar instances where mothers have fought until they attained victory.

We just have to keep fighting until we attain victory. This is also a message to the anti-Hindu “secular” politicians who will use all the provisions of our government machinery, government policies, laws and constitution to kill us with supreme contempt and malicious neglect. Even to utter the two syllables Hindu, they have nothing but disgust and contempt. What right have they to rule over the Hindus? What business do they have to administer Hindu temples?

Those who delight in being palanquin bearers for Madanis, those who shed crocodile tears for Saddam Husseins, those who are able to see the tears of Iraq, Afghanistan and Palestine but are unable to see the tears of the terrorised Hindus of Jammu & Kashmir, why are they wish to portray themselves as guardians of the Hindu society? None of the anti-Hindu “secular” politicians have done any good for us in the past and none of those wretches need to bother pretending to be our benefactors in future. The anti-Hindu “secular” politicians come together only to insult and cast scorn on the Hindus. Even if the Leftists and the Congress-wallahs fight on every occasion, we have witnessed the sorry spectacle of the two political rivals coming together on every single anti-Hindu platform.

You must have heard of the Divine Retreat Centre at Muringoor in Thrissur District against which the police have registered cases of cheating, forceful confinement, causing hurt by poison and dangerous weapons and destruction of evidence and Kerala High Court appointed a high-level team to investigate allegations of criminal activities. CPM Party Secretary Pinaray Vijayan who made a pilgrimage to the Divine Retreat Centre at Muringoor to make his pious contrite confessions was closely following the highly Christianised Congressmen. This godless atheist Communist Pinaray Vijayan came way after giving a good conduct certificate to the Divine Retreat Centre. He even asserted that the prayers conducted at the Divine Retreat Centre can cure diseases. If that is really so then, let the CPM, ruling Kerala State, disband the Kerala Government Department of Health. Let the CPM shut down the hospitals in Kerala. All people in Kerala can go to Christian Divine Retreat Centres, chant their congregational prayers, clap hands and sway in unison and be “saved” from ailments. So let the Kerala Government shut down the Department of Health, all hospitals and primary health centres. We can all go to the Divine Retreat Centres in Muringoor or Kottayam or elsewhere. Is the CPM agreeable to that? Please remember that Comrade V.S Achyutanandan crossed to seas to obtain a cure for his ailments. That is what he did; fly off to America crossing the sea. He did not go to any Muringoor Divine Retreat Centre to say his prayers, WHY? The Communists are only trying to appease the Christian missionaries for money and votes!

Now some of the Hindu mothers have acquired the presence of mind and courage to ask in return, why did you not bring the earlier Pope John Paul II to Divine Retreat Centre in Muringoor for prayer? After all, suffered from Parkinson’s disease for over 20 years? Why didn’t the Christians bring Pope J.P II to the Divine Retreat Centre if the prayers over there would cure diseases?

We are being compelled to counter the propaganda with such retorts. When the missionaries come to us with their propaganda, we are constrained to pay them back in the same coin.

In a tsunami hit beach where Mata Amritanandamayi’s selfless disciples were distributing food and blankets, the missionaries came to distribute their crosses. They pointed to a church in the vicinity and said, the Virgin Mary ordered the tsunami to halt and the tsunami halted. Hearing such incredible propaganda the Hindu mothers were shocked at first. Then they recovered their composure and asked, the Virgin Mary who ordered the tsunami to halt here could have asked the tsunami to halt in Velankanni coast too. Why did she not do so? This is not something we like to or want to say, but we are compelled by the missionary propaganda to resort to making such remarks.

We know that the destructive forces of nature do not penalize or favour the adherents of any particular religion. We don’t believe that divinity always comes up with miracles. Even Bhagawan Sri Rama did not just fly over to Lanka. He built a long sea-bridge using all available help. So we are not the people who expect miracles to occur and we are not impressed by the miracle stories peddled by the missionaries with vivid imagination and glib tongue!

We do not challenge other religions by demanding that their adherents show us miracles in support of heir religions. However we are being compelled to counter their propaganda with sharp retorts.

The Hindu who had an inclusive world view and who saw the several paths of various religions all leading to God, that Hindu is now compelled by the constant barrage of missionary propaganda to make counter propaganda and to put down other religions.

What did the anti-Hindu “secular” politicians gain by such religious and political radicalisation of the Hindus?

Could the anti-Hindu “secular” politicians secure the territory of this country?
Could the anti-Hindu “secular” politicians protect the lives of the citizens of this country? NO!
All they could achieve is to inject religious fundamentalism into the peace-loving Hindus.
If this anti-Hindu Nehruvian “secularism” could have achieved any thing positive,
any thing positive at all, we could have supported this “secularism”. But that is not to be!

We bear in our minds the trail blazed by Dr Hedgewarji, one of the most influential men of this century, and Guru Gowalkarji, the great karma yogi, who with the intent of advancing scientific, technological, economic, cultural and spiritual progress of the nation and strengthening its military might, endeavoured to mould the minds and character of our youth and build generations of courageous patriots to achieve such supreme national objectives.

To advance along the trail blazed by Dr Hedgewarji and Guru Gowalkarji and to take forward this nation to its appointed place in destiny as the undisputed leader of the comity of nations, to sweep away the THREE MORTAL ENEMIES which I had mentioned earlier, not to eliminate those people physically but to neutralise their hostility and to make them behave in amicable manner with us, we will have to inspire them through our own physical might, economic prowess, strength of character and courage of conviction!.

We are willing to respect all the Semitic prophets, we are willing to honour Allah and love the people who have converted to Islam, but we will in no way put up with Islamic fundamentalism. If this is a breach of the “secularism” then so be it! We Hindus will just have to become communalists for as long as it takes to root out this cult of intolerance. After all, we have seen no benefit in Hindus alone adhering to this anti-Hindu Nehruvian “secularism”, so we Hindus will just have to become communalists for some time.

To achieve rapid and all round progress of this great nation, all sections of the society will have to work in unison. The Hindu society, which reveres the sacred memory of Dr Hedgewarji and Guruji, must lead this national endeavour. Every step that we take we should be guided and inspired by our Drji and Guruji and the thousands of selfless Swayamsevaks who went along that sacred path before us. We bow our heads, in all humility, before those great souls and seek their blessings.

With these words, I hereby end my speech. Thank you all.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Previous speech by Smt. K.P. Sasikala Teacher (Hindu Aikya Vedi state leader). Sasikala teacher rips apart the secular mask of communists and exposes the true colour of Communists, Jihadis and Missionaries in the state.

Translators Note:

Temples under non-Hindu control.

Many times common people wring their hands in anguish and express their helplessness against the entrenched anti-Hindu political class. Hindu devotees need not despair. Indeed they can take DIRECT ACTION.

1. According the anti-Hindu “secular” UPA government headed by Dr Manmohan Singh, Muslims have first claim on India’s resources.

While going to a temple, inquire whether the temple is under the control of the HR&CE Department / Devaswom Board / Devasthanam Board. These Departments and Boards are controlled by anti-Hindu “secular” politicians. E.g., Guruvayur Temple, Chidambaram Temple etc.

DON’T PUT MONEY IN THE HUNDIS OF HINDU TEMPLES UNDER NON-HINDU CONTROL, no matter how famous they are.
The money put in the Hundis of such alienated Hindu Temples go straight to the treasury of the anti-Hindu “secular” governments and such money will be doled out for Hajj committees, Jerusalem visits, Christian-run government-aided schools and Muslim Madrassas.
Even the Maulavis are given pension out of such temple funds.
State Pastors Fellowship president Rev K. Pratap Sinha said that a Special Minority Corporation was established in Andhra Pradesh, a subsidy of Rs.20,000 was being extended to Christians to visit Jerusalem and Rs.15,000 worth material was being sanctioned to poor Christian couples who were marrying at mass weddings. Rev K. Pratap gave full credit to the Christian Chief Minister Y.Samuel Rajasekhara Reddy for these blatantly pro-Christian programmes funded out of the State Treasury.
Now Hindus' money is stolen and given to Christians and Muslims so they can breed more and convert more.

If you go to a temple controlled by the Government controlled HR&CE Department / Devaswom Board / Devasthanam Board, please do give money to the employees of the temples like poojaris, watch and ward staff and sweepers but do not put money in the temple Hundi.

Now if you are a sentimental person, there is still something you can do. Donate money to a Hindu-run orphanage or old-age home in the name of your favourite deity, collect the receipt and deposit it in the Hundi in the full knowledge that the anti-Hindu “secular” politicians cannot steal it and use it against us.

2. Convince your relatives and friends not to give money to temples under the control of non-Hindus (temple boards controlled by anti-Hindu “secular” politicians).

3. When the Hindu Temple-goers stop giving money to the Temples controlled by the anti-Hindu “secular” Governments those Temples will become poorer and the anti-Hindu “secular” politicians, - be they of the Congress variety or the Communist ilk – will no longer want to control the those cash-starved Temples. Then it will be easier for the Hindus to retrieve control of Hindu Temples and administer them for the benefit of the Hindu society.

4. Please give money only to temples run by Hindus and encourage the administration to start schools and orphanages and to take over and re-establish dilapidated and ruined temples.

5. There are Hindu-run orphanages, old-age homes and schools for deprived children. Please help them financially.

6. Please inquire about the administration of Charities before giving donation. Do not give any money to Christian Missionary charities like Child’s Relief and You, World Vision etc. They will take your money and convert orphaned Hindu children into rabid Hindu-haters.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------